Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Under what circumstances might people appear to use rules of thumb, as suggested by the assumption of bounded rationality, even though they really were behaving in a manner suggested by the rationality assumption?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Under the situations of change in the environment.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1. Bounded Rational Behavior.

Bounded rationality behavior explains that people are rational but not completely as they do not examine every possible choice given to them but instead sort among the alternatives.

02

Step 2. Reason

People use the assumptions of bounded rationality in situations of change in the environment. The change in environment may lead the decision-maker to adopt it. The decision-maker may use similar methods or repetitive applications when there is a familiar change in the environment.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose that the U.S. federal government has borrowed \(500 billion to expand its total spending on goods and services across the entire economy in an effort to boost by \)500 billion the aggregate production by the nation's firms. Would we apply microeconomic or macroeconomic analysis to analyze this policy action?

In what way do small talk and gossip represent the use of simplifying assumptions?

Consider two models for estimating, in advance of an election, the shares of votes that will go to rival candidates. According to one model, pollstersโ€™ surveys of a randomly chosen set of registered voters before an election can be used to forecast the percentage of votes that each candidate will receive. This first model relies on the assumption that unpaid survey respondents will give truthful responses about how they will vote and that they will actually cast a ballot in the election. The other model uses prices of financial assets (legally binding IOUs) issued by the Iowa Electronic Markets, operated by the University of Iowa, to predict electoral outcomes. The final payments received by owners of these assets, which can be bought or sold during the weeks and days preceding an election, depending on the shares of votes the candidates actually end up receiving. This second model assumes that owners of these assets wish to earn the highest possible returns, and it indicates that the market prices of these assets provide an indication of the percentage of votes that each candidate will actually receive on the day of the election.

(a) Which of these two models for forecasting electoral results is more firmly based on the rationality assumption of economics?

(b) How would an economist evaluate which is the better model for forecasting electoral outcomes?

Explain, in your own words, the rationality assumption, and contrast it with the assumption of bounded rationality proposed by adherents of behavioral economics.

State whether each of the following functions specifies a direct or an inverse relationship.

a. y = 5x

b. y = 10 - 2x

c. y = 3 + x

d. y = โˆ’3x

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free