Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Suppose that people who previously had held jobs become structurally unemployed due to establishment of new government regulations during a period in which the inflation rate remains unchanged. Would the result be a movement along or a shift of the short-run Phillips curve? Explain your reasoning.

Short Answer

Expert verified

As a result,the unemployment rate rises, the quick philips curve will shift more particular, the quick Philips curve will shift to the right.

Step by step solution

01

Step: 1 Introduction:

The Philips curve illustrates the inverse link between inflation and unemployment.In other words, the Philips curve depicts the trade-off between inflation and unemployment, i.e., in order to reduce unemployment, a higher inflation rate must be paid, and vice versa.

02

Step: 2 Short run phillips curve:

When both the rate of inflation and the level of unemployment fluctuate at the same time, motion along the quick Philips curve happens. But at the other extreme, when either the unemployment rate or the annual inflation remain fixed while the other changes, the quick Philips curve shifts.

03

Step: 3 Movement along short-run phillips curve:

In this scenario, it has been said that while the rate of inflation remains unchanged, the unemployment rate is increasing due to structural unemployment.Because the inflation rate remains steady while the unemployment rate rises, the quick Philips curve will shift.More particular, the quick Philips curve will shift to the right.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose that economists were able to use U.S. economic data to demonstrate that the rational expectations hypothesis is true. Would this be sufficient to demonstrate the validity of the policy irrelevance proposition?

Why might it be the case that even if distorted beliefs alter real GDP and the unemployment rate today, such beliefs might be unlikely to arise among households and firms again in the future? Explain your reasoning.

Consider the diagram below, which is drawn under the assumption that the new Keynesian sticky-price theory of aggregate supply applies. Assume that at present, the economy is in long-run equilibrium at point A. Answer the following questions.

a. Suppose that there is a sudden increase in desired investment expenditures. Which of the alternative aggregate demand curves- AD2or AD3-will apply after this event occurs? Other things being equal, what will happen to the equilibrium price level and to equilibrium real GDP in the short ran? Explain.

b. Other things being equal, after the event and adjustments discussed in part (a) have taken place, what will happen to the equilibrium price level and to equilibrium real GDP in the long run? Explain.

Evaluate the following statement: "In an important sense, the term policy irrelevance proposition is misleading because even if the rational expectations hypothesis is valid, economic policy actions can have significant effects on real GDP and the unemployment rate."

Would a U6 version of the natural unemployment rate likely be higher or lower than the traditional natural unemployment rate? Explain your reasoning.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free