Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Evaluate the implications of behavioral economics for macro policymaking.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Poiscy acts have long-term consequences, such as aggregate demand. Rational inattention, or the infrequent update of economic knowledge, leads to sticky product prices and slow adjustment of inflation expectations.

Step by step solution

01

Step :1 Introduction 

Policymakers and academics alike are interested in behavioural economics research. It clarifies what policymakers should be concerned about and improves the quality of our economic models. The work presented at this conference highlights some of the achievements, but it also shows that the marginal product of additional behavioural economics research will remain high.

02

Step :2 Explanation 

The justification for activist policymaking is strengthened by bounded rationality.

Habit formation in househoids can allow future desired real consumption spending to be influenced by previous consumption. Poiscy acts, as a result, have longer-term effects on aggregate demand.

Rational inattention, or the infrequent update of economic knowledge, causes sticky product prices and slow adjustment of inflation expectations.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose that people who previously had held jobs become structurally unemployed due to establishment of new government regulations during a period in which the inflation rate remains unchanged. Would the result be a movement along or a shift of the short-run Phillips curve? Explain your reasoning.

Consider a situation in which a future president has appointed Federal Reserve leaders who conduct monetary policy much more erratically than in past years. The consequence is that the quantity of money in circulation varies in a much more unsystematic and, hence, hard-to-predict manner. According to the policy irrelevance proposition, is it more or less likely that the Fed's policy actions will cause real GDP to change in the short run? Explain.

Normally, when aggregate demand increases, firms find it more profitable to raise prices than to leave prices unchanged. The idea behind the small-menu-cost explanation for price stickiness is that firms will leave their prices unchanged if their profit gain from adjusting prices is less than the menu costs they would incur if they change prices. If firms anticipate that a rise in demand is likely to last for a long time, does this make them more or less likely to adjust their prices when they face small menu costs? (Hint: Profits are a flow that firms earn from week to week and month to month, but small menu costs are a one-time expense.)

Why might it be the case that even if distorted beliefs alter real GDP and the unemployment rate today, such beliefs might be unlikely to arise among households and firms again in the future? Explain your reasoning.

Would a U6 version of the natural unemployment rate likely be higher or lower than the traditional natural unemployment rate? Explain your reasoning.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free