Chapter 2: Q. 2.22 (page 47)
Suppose that in Fig 2-2, the nation currently is producing combination D in the table and on the graph of the production possibilities curve. What is the opportunity cost of producing 20 million more tablet devices and moving to production combination F?
17.5 million
Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for free
What must be true of the trade-off perceived by people who have multiple sex partners?
The following table illustrates the points a student can earn on examinations in economics and biology if the student uses all available hours for study. Plot this student’s production possibilities curve. Does the PPC illustrate the law of increasing additional costs?
| Economics | Biology |
| 100 | 40 |
| 90 | 60 |
| 80 | 75 |
| 70 | 85 |
| 60 | 93 |
| 50 | 98 |
| 40 | 100 |
Suppose that in Fig 2-4, the nation currently has sufficient resources to produce combinations located along only the innermost production possibilities curve. In addition, suppose that the nation's residents have determined that smartphones function mainly as consumption goods while tablet devices function primarily as capital goods. If the nation produces no additional tablets this year, will the intermediate-shifted PPC resulting from minimal economic growth or the farthest shifted PPC caused by more significant economic growth be more likely to apply next year?
Define opportunity cost. What is your opportunity cost of attending a class at 11:00 A.M.? How does it differ from your opportunity cost of attending a class at 8:00 A.M.?
Recently, a woman named Mary Krawiec attended an auction in Troy, New York. At the auction, a bank was seeking to sell a foreclosed property: a large Victorian house suffering from years of neglect in a neighborhood in which many properties had been on the market for years yet remained unsold. Her \(10 offer was the highest bid in the auction, and she handed over a \)10 bill for a title to ownership. Once she acquired the house, however, she became responsible for all taxes on the property and for an overdue water bill of \(2,000. In addition, to make the house habitable, she and her husband devoted months of time and unpaid labor to renovating the property. In the process, they incurred explicit expenses totaling \)65,000. Why do you suppose that the bank was willing to sell the house to Ms. Krawiec for only $10? (Hint: Contemplate the bank’s expected gain, net of all explicit and opportunity costs, if it had attempted to make the house habitable.)
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.
