Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Country A and country B produce the same consumption goods and capital goods and currently have identical production possibilities curves. They also have the same resources at present, and they have access to the same technology.

a. At present, does either country have a comparative advantage in producing capital goods? Consumption goods?

b. Currently, country A has chosen to produce more consumption goods, compared with country B. Other things being equal, which country will experience the larger outward shift of its PPC during the next year?

Short Answer

Expert verified

a. They both have the same advantage.

b. B

Step by step solution

01

Step1. Introduction

Theory of comparative advantage states that a person should engage in an economic activity which he/she has a comparative advantage in, i.e. which he/she is better off at performing than the other activity. In terms of economies, they should engage in production of those goods and services at which they are better off than the other.

02

Step2. Explanation

a. Two countries A and B have identical production possibility, they have the same level of resources and state of technology. This implies that both the countries A and B are at the same level in terms of production and hence no one is better off than the other in terms of production.

b. When country A will chose more consumer goods, it will remain on the same curve. In fact, chances are that country A's curve shifts inwards as the country is substituting capital goods for consumption goods. Country B, however, chooses the same combination of goods, or comparatively produces more capital goods than A, it will hence be able to produce more goods using those capital goods. So, its production possibility curve will shift outwards.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Recently, a woman named Mary Krawiec attended an auction in Troy, New York. At the auction, a bank was seeking to sell a foreclosed property: a large Victorian house suffering from years of neglect in a neighborhood in which many properties had been on the market for years yet remained unsold. Her \(10 offer was the highest bid in the auction, and she handed over a \)10 bill for a title to ownership. Once she acquired the house, however, she became responsible for all taxes on the property and for an overdue water bill of \(2,000. In addition, to make the house habitable, she and her husband devoted months of time and unpaid labor to renovating the property. In the process, they incurred explicit expenses totaling \)65,000. Why do you suppose that the bank was willing to sell the house to Ms. Krawiec for only $10? (Hint: Contemplate the bankโ€™s expected gain, net of all explicit and opportunity costs, if it had attempted to make the house habitable.)

Senator Borman interjects the following comment after the statements by Senators Creighton and Long reported in Problems 2-10 and 2-11: โ€œIn fact, both of my esteemed colleagues are wrong, because an unacceptably large portion of our nationโ€™s resources is currently unemployed.โ€ Of the labeled points on the diagram, which one is consistent with Senator Bormanโ€™s position?

During a debate on the floor of the U.S. Senate, Senator Creighton states, โ€œOur nation should not devote so many of its fully employed resources to producing capital goods because we already are not producing enough consumption goods for our citizens.โ€ Compared with the other labeled points on the diagram, which one could be consistent with the current product combination choice that Senator Creighton believes the nation has made?

A nationโ€™s residents can allocate their scarce resources either to producing consumer goods or to producing human capitalโ€”that is, providing themselves with training and education. The following table displays the production possibilities for this nation:

Production CombinationUnits of Consumer GoodsUnits of Human Capital
A0100
B1097
C2090
D3075
E4055
F5030
G600

(a) Suppose that the nationโ€™s residents currently produce combination A. What is the opportunity cost of increasing the production of consumption goods by 10 units? By 60 units?

(b) Does the law of increasing additional costs hold true for this nation? Why or why not?

Suppose that in Fig 2-24, the nation with other wise the same background conditions as in Problem 2-23 currently has sufficient resources to produce combinations located along only the innermost production possibilities curve. If the nation produces no additional smartphones this year, will the intermediate-shifted PPC resulting from minimal economic growth or the farthest shifted PPC caused by more significant economic growth be more likely to apply next year?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free