Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A nation’s residents can allocate their scarce resources either to producing consumer goods or to producing human capital—that is, providing themselves with training and education. The following table displays the production possibilities for this nation:

Production CombinationUnits of Consumer GoodsUnits of Human Capital
A0100
B1097
C2090
D3075
E4055
F5030
G600

(a) Suppose that the nation’s residents currently produce combination A. What is the opportunity cost of increasing the production of consumption goods by 10 units? By 60 units?

(b) Does the law of increasing additional costs hold true for this nation? Why or why not?

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) When 10 units, the opportunity cost is 90 units. When 60 units, the opportunity cost is 40 units.

(b) Yes, it holds true.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1. Given Information

The data for consumer goods and human capital is as follows:

Production CombinationUnits of Consumer GoodsUnits of Human Capital
A0100
B1097
C2090
D3075
E4055
F5030
G600
02

Part (a) Opportunity Cost

Opportunity cost is the opportunity of the next best alternative forgone to satisfy human wants.

If the combination A is produced in the economy.

When the production of consumption goods is increased by 10 units, the opportunity cost is the 90 units forgone of the units of human capital.

When the production of consumption goods is increased by 60 units, the opportunity cost is the 40 units forgone of the units of human capital.

03

Part (b). The law of additional cost

The law of additional cost states that the increase in the production of one good would decrease the production of other goods.

The law holds true in this case as well as there is an increase in units of consumer goods the units of human capital decrease.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose that in Fig 2-24, the nation with other wise the same background conditions as in Problem 2-23 currently has sufficient resources to produce combinations located along only the innermost production possibilities curve. If the nation produces no additional smartphones this year, will the intermediate-shifted PPC resulting from minimal economic growth or the farthest shifted PPC caused by more significant economic growth be more likely to apply next year?

In spite of the lower opportunity cost of rail-gun projectiles instead of missiles, does the U.S. Navy continue to face an increasing additional cost, in terms of forgone ship production, to obtain additional weapons? Explain briefly.

Why might the production possibilities curve relating the number of electronic-gadget-accessory boxes at passenger seats to the quantity of seats on a plane be bowed? Explain your reasoning.

During a debate on the floor of the U.S. Senate, Senator Creighton states, “Our nation should not devote so many of its fully employed resources to producing capital goods because we already are not producing enough consumption goods for our citizens.” Compared with the other labeled points on the diagram, which one could be consistent with the current product combination choice that Senator Creighton believes the nation has made?

Recently, a woman named Mary Krawiec attended an auction in Troy, New York. At the auction, a bank was seeking to sell a foreclosed property: a large Victorian house suffering from years of neglect in a neighborhood in which many properties had been on the market for years yet remained unsold. Her \(10 offer was the highest bid in the auction, and she handed over a \)10 bill for a title to ownership. Once she acquired the house, however, she became responsible for all taxes on the property and for an overdue water bill of \(2,000. In addition, to make the house habitable, she and her husband devoted months of time and unpaid labor to renovating the property. In the process, they incurred explicit expenses totaling \)65,000. Why do you suppose that the bank was willing to sell the house to Ms. Krawiec for only $10? (Hint: Contemplate the bank’s expected gain, net of all explicit and opportunity costs, if it had attempted to make the house habitable.)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free