Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A British pharmaceutical company spent several years and considerable funds on the development of a treatment for HIV patients. Now, with the protection afforded by patent rights, the company has the potential to reap enormous gains. The government, in response, has threatened to tax away any economic rents the company may earn. Is this a sensible policy? Why or why not? (Hint: Contrast the short-run and long-run effects of taxing away the economic rents.)

Short Answer

Expert verified

Threatening to raise economic rent taxes may not be the best policy.

Step by step solution

01

Introduction

Threatening to raise economic rent taxes may not be the best policy. This government policy would result in a reduction in R&D spending.

Before investing in research and development companies analyze the potential returns. There will be little motivation for corporations to perform further research if the expected returns are going to be nil.

02

Explanation

Short-run economic rents encourage businesses to invest in research and development and to make the most efficient use of their resources. Firms examine the long-term profitability of investing in product development.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The owner of WebCity is trying to decide whether to remain a proprietorship or to incorporate. Suppose that the corporate tax rate on profits is 20percent and the personal income tax rate is localid="1653216490078" 30percent. For simplicity, assume that all corporate profits (after corporate taxes are paid) are distributed as dividends in the year they are earned and that such dividends are subject to tax at the personal income tax rate.

a. If the owner of WebCity expects to earn localid="1653216495193" \(100,000in before-tax profits this year, regardless of whether the firm is a proprietorship or a corporation, which method of organization should be chosen?

b. What is the dollar value of the after-tax advantage of the form of organization determined in part (a)?

c. Suppose that the corporate form of organization has cost advantages that will raise beforetax profits by localid="1653216505277" \)50,000. Should the owner of WebCity incorporate?

d. Based on parts (a) and (c), by how much will after-tax profits change due to incorporation?

e. Suppose that tax policy is changed to completely exempt from personal taxation the first localid="1653216517393" $40,000per year in dividends. Would this change in policy affect the decision made in part (a)?

f. How can you explain the fact that even though corporate profits are subject to double taxation, most business in the United States is conducted by corporations rather than by proprietorships or partnerships?

If you were a government official, would you rather have to deal with many small businesses or a few large corporations?

Why might state-owned companies that China's government ordered to buy more shares to help boost returns have been equally likely to have later earned either higher or lower returns? Explain your reasoning.

Reconsider Table 21-1, and assume that as in Problem 21-23, you wish to save enough this year to have \( 50,000 available for your planned retirement 30 years into the future. How many dollars would you have to save this year to ensure that a total amount of \) 50,000 would be accumulated 30 years into the future if the interest rate appropriate for discounting decreases to 3 percent?

Explain the basic differences between a share of stock and a bond.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free