Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

If you were a government official, would you rather have to deal with many small businesses or a few large corporations?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Entrepreneurs frequently avoid thinking about big issues like goals, tactics, and abilities because of their overpowering desire to act.

At some point, they will have to deliberately structure such investigations into their enterprises and lives.

Step by step solution

01

Introduction

Surprisingly, there is no official definition for "large" or "small" firms. The federal government takes into account a company's typical annual revenue or personnel count.

02

Resources

Large firms can deliver "more" to their employees since they have more resources. Large firms, for example, are known for paying higher wages and bonuses. They may also be more likely to contribute to additional benefits and pay a higher share of the employer's insurance premiums.

As a result of these resources, employees have improved access to resources. This means that if you have a technical issue, you can usually contact an in-house support team for assistance. They may even simply provide you with a new PC.

03

Structure and Order

Large corporations have greater structure and order. If you thrive in a structured setting, a major corporation might be the right fit for you.

You can use training and policy guides to assist you. And almost always, there are procedures in place to assist you in making decisions.

04

 Step 4: Fewer Benefits

There may be fewer rewards with less resources. To begin with, health insurance is not needed for all small enterprises.

As a result, your employer may encourage you to purchase government-sponsored health insurance. Furthermore, while some firms may offer you a stipend to help with these costs, not all employers will.

05

Conclusion

  • Large firms can deliver "more" to their employees since they have more resources.
  • Large firms, for example, are known for paying higher wages and bonuses.
  • They may also be more likely to contribute to additional benefits and pay a higher share of the employer's insurance premiums.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A British pharmaceutical company spent several years and considerable funds on the development of a treatment for HIV patients. Now, with the protection afforded by patent rights, the company has the potential to reap enormous gains. The government, in response, has threatened to tax away any economic rents the company may earn. Is this a sensible policy? Why or why not? (Hint: Contrast the short-run and long-run effects of taxing away the economic rents.)

Reconsider Figure 21-1 and the data provided in Problem 21-19, and suppose that P2=$2,800 per acre. By how much do economic rents change when the rental rate on land rises from P1toP2 in the figure?

Take a look at Figure 21-1. Suppose that Q = 10 acres and P = $2000 per acre. What is the dollar amount of economic rents received during the current period, and why is this amount classified as economic rents?

Suppose that you are tryang to dectoe whether to spend \(1,000 on stocks issued by WildWeb or on bonds issued by the same company. There is a 50 percent chance that the value of the stock will rise to S2,200 at the end of the year and a 50 percent chance that the stock will be worthless at the end of the year. The bonds promise an interest rate of 20 percent per year, and it is certain that the bonds and interest will be repaid at the end of the year.

a. Assuming that your time horizon is exactly one year, will you choose the stocks or the bonds?

b. By how much is your expected end-of-year wealth reduced if you make the wrong choice?

c. Suppose the odds of success improve for WildWebi Now there is a 60 percent chance that the value of the stock will be \)2,200 at year's end and only a 40 percent chance that it will be worthless, Should you now choose the stocks or the bonds?

d. By how much did your expected end-of-year wealth rise as a result of the improved outlook for WidWeb?

Take a look at Figure 21-2. Explain why the figure implies that if the amount of accounting profit were to shrink to zero while the normal rate of return on investment remained unchanged, economic profit necessarily would become negative.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free