Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Manufacturing firms based in Columbus, Ohio, and Erie, Pennsylvania, have proposed a merger. If they were to merge, the resulting value of the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index in the nationwide market for the product they produce would rise from 1,400 to 1,800. Under current U.S. antitrust guidelines, would this proposed merger raise concerns for the U.S. Justice Department or Federal Trade Commission?

Short Answer

Expert verified

No this proposed merger raise concerns for the U.S. Justice Department or Federal Trade Commission

Step by step solution

01

Given Information

US Antitrust Laws are also known as contest regulations, the US hostile to believe regulations shield the purchasers from out of line strategic approaches and guarantee fair rivalry in the open-market economy.

02

Explanation

According to the US against trust rules, there is no reason to worry till the HHI doesn't surpass 5000. For this situation, post-consolidation the HHI ascends from 1400to1800. Subsequently, there is no reason for worry for the FTC.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Recently, a food retailer called Whole Foods sought to purchase Wild Oats, a competitor in the market for organic foods. When the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) sought to block this merger on antitrust grounds, FTC officials argued that such a merger would dramatically increase concentration in the market for "premium organic foods." Whole Foods' counterargument was that it considered itself to be part of the broadly defined supermarket industry that includes retailers such as Albert sons, Kroger, and Safeway. What key issue of antitrust regulation was involved in this dispute? Explain.

The table below depicts the cost and demand structure a natural monopoly faces.

a. Calculate total revenues, marginal revenue, and marginal cost at each output level. If this firm is allowed to operate as a monopolist, what will be the quantity produced and the price charged by the firm? What will be the amount of monopoly profit? [Hint: Recall that marginal revenue equals the change in total revenues (Pร—Q)from each additional unit and that marginal cost equals the change in total costs from each additional unit.]

b. If regulators require the firm to practice marginal cost pricing, what quantity will it produce, and what price will it charge? What is the firm's profit under this regulatory framework? [Hint: Recall that average total cost equals total cost divided by quantity and that profits equal (P-ATC)ร—Q.].

c. If regulators require the firm to practice average cost pricing, what quantity will it produce, and what price will it charge? What is the firm's profit under this regulatory framework?

A bank in Austin, Texas, has allowed its state banking license, under which it had been regulated by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, a U.S. bank regulator, to expire. It has switched to a federal banking license, under which it is now regulated by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, another bank regulator. Do these regulators subject the bank to social or economic regulation?

Consider the data from Problem 27-11. Suppose that antitrust authorities have determined that the relevant market includes both e-books and physical books. These authorities perceive that a monopoly situation exists that can be challenged on legal grounds if the value of the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index exceeds 5000. On the basis of this criterion, do the antitrust authorities conclude that there are grounds for a legal challenge? Explain.

Consider panel (b) of Figure 27-2. The quantity Q1 is 2,000units, the price P1 is \(2per unit, the average cost AC1 is \)4per unit, and the vertical distance to point C is $6per unit. What is the dollar amount of the losses earned by this natural monopolist when its price is equal to its marginal cost of producing Q1 units?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free