Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Consider panel (b) of Figure 27-2. The quantity Q1 is 2,000units, the price P1 is \(2per unit, the average cost AC1 is \)4per unit, and the vertical distance to point C is $6per unit. What is the dollar amount of the losses earned by this natural monopolist when its price is equal to its marginal cost of producing Q1 units?

Short Answer

Expert verified

the dollar amount of the losses earned by this natural monopolist is$4000

Step by step solution

01

Given Information

Natural Monopoly alludes to a market where there should exist just a single dealer. In certain business sectors, a solitary dealer is expected for proficient creation since that one firm can deliver the complete result at a lower cost than a few firms could.

02

Explanation

Assuming the long-run normal expense bend of the restraining infrastructure is constantly falling over the whole scope of market interest, then, at that point, it demonstrates that only one firm can serve the market.

We know,

Quantity Q1=2000units

PriceP1=$2per unit

Average cost AC1=$4per unit

The total revenue = $4000and the total cost = $8000

Hence the loss is=$4000-$8000=-$4000

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose that a firm's self-interested owners or managers have no moral or ethical qualms and do not anticipate being caught if they agree to participate in a collusive conspiracy. Why might they still decide not to do so if only a moderate revenue gain would result? (Hint: How would engaging in the collusion techniques listed in Figure 27-4affect a conspiring firm's total costs?)

Why do you suppose that a growing number of behavioral economists are calling for adoption of more pragmatic approaches to formulating regulations? Explain briefly.

Do you think that the regulation described in Problem 27-6 is more likely an example of the capture hypothesis or the share-the-gains, share-the-pains theory? Why?

An years past, firms around the world have secretly engaged in collusive agreements to restrain production and push prices above competitive levels.

Evidence compiled by government officials investigating such agreements has revealed that conspiring firms often utilize similar methods of establishing and enforcing collusive restraints of trade. Most agreements, for instance, assign to each firm an allowed market share, a permitted region of operations, or an approved set of customers. In addition, participating firms commonly are required to exchange sales information so that they can monitor adherence to their agreements to restrain trade. In this chapter, you will learn why firms that typically utilize these techniques to formulate and maintain collusive agreements engage in secret conspiracies: Such agreements are illegal under U.S. antitrust laws.

Distinguish between economic regulation and social regulation

Why do you think that many firms with lengthy truck routes now try to recruit married couples to drive their trucks?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free