Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Consider the data from Problem 27-11. Suppose that antitrust authorities have determined that the relevant market includes both e-books and physical books. These authorities perceive that a monopoly situation exists that can be challenged on legal grounds if the value of the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index exceeds 5000. On the basis of this criterion, do the antitrust authorities conclude that there are grounds for a legal challenge? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Because HHI's entire [e-books and physical books] market value is less than 5000, antitrust authorities can assume that there is no ground for a legal challenge in the merged market.

Step by step solution

01

Introduction.

Physical books are known to as printed books. A printed book is composed of a number of pages bound together by the front and rear covers. The term "e-book" refers to a digital book. All pages of an e-book are in digital format, which indicates the book has been converted to an electronic format.

02

Given data.

Calculating the Herfindahl-Hirschman index value for mixed marketplaces (e-books and physical books):

HHI=42.52+20.52+202+7.52+52+4.52

HHI=1806.25+420.25+400+56.25+25+20.25

HHI=2728

The combined market value of the Herfindahl-Hirschman index (e-books and physical books) is2728.

03

Explanation.

If the value of HHIexceeds 5000, authorities believe a monopoly situation exists in the market, which can be contested on legal grounds.

Since HHI's combined [e-books and physical books] market value is less than 5000, antitrust authorities can decide that there is no basis for a legal challenge in the combined market.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider the following fictitious sales data (in thousands of dollars) for both e-books and physical books. Firms have numbers instead of names, and Firm 1generates only e-book sales. Suppose that antitrust authorities' initial evaluation of whether a single firm may possess "monopoly power" is whether its share of sales in the relevant market exceeds 70percent.

a. Suppose that the antitrust authorities determine that selling physical books and e-book selling are individually separate relevant markets. Does an initial evaluation suggest that any single firm has monopoly power, as defined by the antitrust authorities?

b. Suppose that in fact there is really only a single book industry, in which firms compete in selling both physical books and e-books. According to the antitrust authorities' initial test of the potential for monopoly power, is there actually cause for concern?

Why do you suppose that a growing number of behavioral economists are calling for adoption of more pragmatic approaches to formulating regulations? Explain briefly.

An years past, firms around the world have secretly engaged in collusive agreements to restrain production and push prices above competitive levels.

Evidence compiled by government officials investigating such agreements has revealed that conspiring firms often utilize similar methods of establishing and enforcing collusive restraints of trade. Most agreements, for instance, assign to each firm an allowed market share, a permitted region of operations, or an approved set of customers. In addition, participating firms commonly are required to exchange sales information so that they can monitor adherence to their agreements to restrain trade. In this chapter, you will learn why firms that typically utilize these techniques to formulate and maintain collusive agreements engage in secret conspiracies: Such agreements are illegal under U.S. antitrust laws.

Distinguish between economic regulation and social regulation

The manager of a Pittsburgh shop wishes to sell on eBay a used telescope that is in good condition. The manager knows that prospective buyers perceive a 50-50 chance that the telescope is in good condition. If it is, buyers are willing to pay \(1,000, but if it is in poor condition, they will pay only \)200. What is the average amount a buyer will be willing to pay? Is there a lemons problem? Explain.

An years past, firms around the world have secretly engaged in collusive agreements to restrain production and push prices above competitive levels.

Evidence compiled by government officials investigating such agreements has revealed that conspiring firms often utilize similar methods of establishing and enforcing collusive restraints of trade. Most agreements, for instance, assign to each firm an allowed market share, a permitted region of operations, or an approved set of customers. In addition, participating firms commonly are required to exchange sales information so that they can monitor adherence to their agreements to restrain trade. In this chapter, you will learn why firms that typically utilize these techniques to formulate and maintain collusive agreements engage in secret conspiracies: Such agreements are illegal under U.S. antitrust laws.

Identify alternative theories aimed at explaining the behavior of regulators

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free