Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Are lemons problems likely to be more common in some industries and less common in others? Based on your answer to this question, should government regulatory activities designed to reduce the scope of lemons problems take the form of economic regulation or social regulation? Take a stand, and support your reasoning.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Lemon problems are more probable in some industries and less likely in others.

Balance the trade, economic controls would exacerbate the lemon problems. To restrict the scope of lemon problems, societal rules should be imposed.

Step by step solution

01

Introduction

Lemon problems arise in businesses where quality control of goods and services is challenging. As a result, lemon problems are more probable in some industries and less likely in others.

02

Given Information

Given data:

-Problems with lemons are more probable in some industries and less likely in others.

-Economic regulation or social regulation are used to reduce the scope of lemon problems.

03

Explanation

  • Lemon issues arise in businesses where quality control of goods and services is challenging. As a result, lemon problems are more probable in some industries and less likely in others.
  • Lemon issues are likely to have a detrimental impact on product prices. Producers of these goods attempt to minimize the production of high-quality goods in order to reduce costs.
  • To decrease the scope of lemon issues, social restrictions would be effective. Social rules can prevent negative spillover effects from lemon problems.
  • Because they attempt to balance the trade, economic controls would exacerbate the lemon problems. To restrict the scope of lemon problems, societal rules should be imposed.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose that a firm's self-interested owners or managers have no moral or ethical qualms and do not anticipate being caught if they agree to participate in a collusive conspiracy. Why might they still decide not to do so if only a moderate revenue gain would result? (Hint: How would engaging in the collusion techniques listed in Figure 27-4affect a conspiring firm's total costs?)

An years past, firms around the world have secretly engaged in collusive agreements to restrain production and push prices above competitive levels.

Evidence compiled by government officials investigating such agreements has revealed that conspiring firms often utilize similar methods of establishing and enforcing collusive restraints of trade. Most agreements, for instance, assign to each firm an allowed market share, a permitted region of operations, or an approved set of customers. In addition, participating firms commonly are required to exchange sales information so that they can monitor adherence to their agreements to restrain trade. In this chapter, you will learn why firms that typically utilize these techniques to formulate and maintain collusive agreements engage in secret conspiracies: Such agreements are illegal under U.S. antitrust laws.

Distinguish between economic regulation and social regulation

Why do you suppose that nearly all of the world's antitrust authorities agree that collusive conspiracies to restrain trade and fix prices are illegal?

As noted in the chapter, separating the production of electricity from its delivery has led to considerable deregulation of producers.

a. Briefly explain which of these two aspects of the sale of electricity remains susceptible to natural monopoly problems.

b. Suppose that the potential natural monopoly problem you identified in part (a) actually arises. Why is marginal cost pricing not a feasible solution? What makes average cost pricing a feasible solution?

c. Discuss two approaches that a regulator could use to try to implement an average-cost-pricing solution to the problem identified in part (a).

Manufacturing firms based in Columbus, Ohio, and Erie, Pennsylvania, have proposed a merger. If they were to merge, the resulting value of the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index in the nationwide market for the product they produce would rise from 1,400 to 1,800. Under current U.S. antitrust guidelines, would this proposed merger raise concerns for the U.S. Justice Department or Federal Trade Commission?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free