Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

As noted in the chapter, separating the production of electricity from its delivery has led to considerable deregulation of producers.

a. Briefly explain which of these two aspects of the sale of electricity remains susceptible to natural monopoly problems.

b. Suppose that the potential natural monopoly problem you identified in part (a) actually arises. Why is marginal cost pricing not a feasible solution? What makes average cost pricing a feasible solution?

c. Discuss two approaches that a regulator could use to try to implement an average-cost-pricing solution to the problem identified in part (a).

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) The production process remains more vulnerable than the distribution process due to its overpricing issue.

(b) Marginal cost pricing is inefficient since the price is always lower than the average.

(c) Rate of return and Service cost regulation.

Step by step solution

01

Given Information

Given data:

The separation of electricity generation and delivery has resulted in significant deregulation of producers, and two components of power sales remain vulnerable to natural monopoly difficulties.

02

Aspects of the sale of electricity remains susceptible to natural monopoly problems(part a)

Deregulation of gas and power generation is becoming increasingly popular.

(a) The natural monopoly issue is concerned with inefficient pricing and underproduction. The production process remains more vulnerable than the distribution process due to its overpricing issue.

03

Feasible solution(part b)

(b) Marginal cost pricing is inefficient since the price is always lower than the average. If the company continues to use marginal costing, it will lose money and eventually shut down. If the price is fixed at the average cost, enterprises will be able to cover their costs and produce at berak, resulting in no profit or loss.

04

Two approaches that a regulator could use to try to implement an average-cost-pricing(part c) 

(c) There are two aspects to deregulating natural monopolies:

- Rate of return. The rate of return pricing principle asserts that prices should be competitive without generating economic profits.

- Service cost regulation: According to this, the price should only cover the average cost in order to keep costs reasonable.

This theory is applied in natural monopolies, when prices are overcharged because average revenue is equated with price instead of marginal cost and revenue.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Do you think that the regulation described in Problem 27-6 is more likely an example of the capture hypothesis or the share-the-gains, share-the-pains theory? Why?

A bank in Austin, Texas, has allowed its state banking license, under which it had been regulated by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, a U.S. bank regulator, to expire. It has switched to a federal banking license, under which it is now regulated by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, another bank regulator. Do these regulators subject the bank to social or economic regulation?

Recently, a food retailer called Whole Foods sought to purchase Wild Oats, a competitor in the market for organic foods. When the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) sought to block this merger on antitrust grounds, FTC officials argued that such a merger would dramatically increase concentration in the market for "premium organic foods." Whole Foods' counterargument was that it considered itself to be part of the broadly defined supermarket industry that includes retailers such as Albert sons, Kroger, and Safeway. What key issue of antitrust regulation was involved in this dispute? Explain.

The manager of a Pittsburgh shop wishes to sell on eBay a used telescope that is in good condition. The manager knows that prospective buyers perceive a 50-50 chance that the telescope is in good condition. If it is, buyers are willing to pay \(1,000, but if it is in poor condition, they will pay only \)200. What is the average amount a buyer will be willing to pay? Is there a lemons problem? Explain.

Consider panel (b) of Figure 27-2. The quantity Q1 is 2,000units, the price P1 is \(2per unit, the average cost AC1 is \)4per unit, and the vertical distance to point C is $6per unit. What is the dollar amount of the losses earned by this natural monopolist when its price is equal to its marginal cost of producing Q1 units?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free