Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

An years past, firms around the world have secretly engaged in collusive agreements to restrain production and push prices above competitive levels.

Evidence compiled by government officials investigating such agreements has revealed that conspiring firms often utilize similar methods of establishing and enforcing collusive restraints of trade. Most agreements, for instance, assign to each firm an allowed market share, a permitted region of operations, or an approved set of customers. In addition, participating firms commonly are required to exchange sales information so that they can monitor adherence to their agreements to restrain trade. In this chapter, you will learn why firms that typically utilize these techniques to formulate and maintain collusive agreements engage in secret conspiracies: Such agreements are illegal under U.S. antitrust laws.

Recognize the practical difficulties in regulating the prices charged by natural monopolies

Short Answer

Expert verified

A training reflection that summarises what data, competencies, and perspectives pupils should be able to demonstrate after gathering input.

Step by step solution

01

Given information 

If a specific company can serve a market at a lower cost than any fusion of multiple or more entities, that trade is considered to be an excellent dominance.

02

Explanation 

The public utilizes such as the electric utilities are of the nature of natural monopolies.

They utilize a large network of wires to transmit electricity to their customers and large set up to generate thermal power or hydro power, as the case may be.

Owing to large operational cost that involves cost of generating and transmitting electricity such companies experience a high level of average cost initially.

The average costs would fall and further fall in long-run only when there is increasingly higher production of electricity. That means, such companies would be able to reap the benefits of economies of scale only when they produce increasingly higher levels of output.

03

Explanation 

Given that individuals and firms have started relying on alternative sources of electricity by generating them using non-traditional distributed power generation technique such as by installing solar panels or using wind turbine or using energy-producing biogas, the demand for electricity supplied by electric utilities is increasingly falling down. As the result of which the electric utilities feel compelled to reduce their supply of electricity. With lower production, the electric utilities would be compelled to operate at higher long-run average cost and experience diseconomies of scale. Internal diseconomies would arise as there is large number of resources in place to take care of small level of production. There will be issues of co-ordination. There will be higher numbers of assistants and supervisors than required. The management structure would become cumbersome and overall efficiency of the management would fall.

The external diseconomies would arise due to expansion of the industry on one hand and on the other hand, due to rise in factor prices as electric utilities faces competition with the producers of solar panels, biogas plant and wind turbines.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

An years past, firms around the world have secretly engaged in collusive agreements to restrain production and push prices above competitive levels.

Evidence compiled by government officials investigating such agreements has revealed that conspiring firms often utilize similar methods of establishing and enforcing collusive restraints of trade. Most agreements, for instance, assign to each firm an allowed market share, a permitted region of operations, or an approved set of customers. In addition, participating firms commonly are required to exchange sales information so that they can monitor adherence to their agreements to restrain trade. In this chapter, you will learn why firms that typically utilize these techniques to formulate and maintain collusive agreements engage in secret conspiracies: Such agreements are illegal under U.S. antitrust laws.

Identify alternative theories aimed at explaining the behavior of regulators

A few years ago, the U.S. government created a "Do Not Call Registry" and forbade marketing firms from calling people who placed their names on this list. Today, an increasing number of companies are sending mail solicitations to individuals inviting them to send back an enclosed postcard for more information about the firms' products. What these solicitations fail to mention is that they are worded in such a way that someone who returns the postcard gives up protection from telephone solicitations, even if they are on the government's "Do Not Call Registry." In what type of behavior are these companies engaging? Explain your answer. (Hint: Are these firms meeting the letter of the law but violating its spirit?)

Who pays for the many hours of work that numerous officials of agencies such as the Consumer Product Safety Commission devote to establishing new regulations?

As noted in the chapter, separating the production of electricity from its delivery has led to considerable deregulation of producers.

a. Briefly explain which of these two aspects of the sale of electricity remains susceptible to natural monopoly problems.

b. Suppose that the potential natural monopoly problem you identified in part (a) actually arises. Why is marginal cost pricing not a feasible solution? What makes average cost pricing a feasible solution?

c. Discuss two approaches that a regulator could use to try to implement an average-cost-pricing solution to the problem identified in part (a).

A firm that sells both Internet-security software and computer antivirus software will sell the antivirus software as a stand-alone product. It will only sell the Internet-security software to consumers in a combined package that also includes the antivirus software. What is this business practice called?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free