Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

An years past, firms around the world have secretly engaged in collusive agreements to restrain production and push prices above competitive levels.

Evidence compiled by government officials investigating such agreements has revealed that conspiring firms often utilize similar methods of establishing and enforcing collusive restraints of trade. Most agreements, for instance, assign to each firm an allowed market share, a permitted region of operations, or an approved set of customers. In addition, participating firms commonly are required to exchange sales information so that they can monitor adherence to their agreements to restrain trade. In this chapter, you will learn why firms that typically utilize these techniques to formulate and maintain collusive agreements engage in secret conspiracies: Such agreements are illegal under U.S. antitrust laws.

Distinguish between economic regulation and social regulation

Short Answer

Expert verified

A training reflection that summarises what data, competencies, and perspectives pupils should be able to demonstrate after gathering input.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

Statistics from the OECD Wellbeing, morality, the ecosystem, and communal solidarity are all safeguarded by ethical legislation. The main purpose of social restrictions may be minor or even unintended, yet they can be enormous.

02

Explanation 

The businesses with 50or more employees are considered to experience lower long-run average costs as their output increases. Such businesses are common in sectors such as hotels & motels, engineering goods, power & electric supply, automobiles, chemical, securities, banking, transportation, communication and manufacturers of products of mass consumptions.

This means such businesses are designated large set up with high levels of operational costs that caters to the needs of the larger people base and that they have the potential to form cartels, influence price and availability of goods in the market.

Owing to large operational costs and their potential to meet demands of larger people base, it is necessary to regulate the operations of the firms from different angle with prime focus on environmental impact, product standardization, fair trade practices, fair employment practices and compliance with rules \& regulations that defines the category to which they belong to.

That means, there are two angles to regulations - economic and social.

03

Explanation

The economic regulations focus on adherence of such businesses with respect to parameters such as free trade practices, restriction of monopolistic trade practices, price & rate regulation, goods availability regulations, product standardization, entry & exit regulations, financial regulations and fair employment practices.

The social regulations focus on adherence of such businesses with respect to parameters such as right advertising, responsible production activities, health safety regulations and occupational regulations. The objective of such regulations is to prevent misleading advertisements, promote health safety compliances, check all forms of discrimination at workplace, promote compliance with environmental standards for air & water and promote responsible production activities.

Thus, it can be concluded that stringent work rules that are imposed on French businesses with 50or more employees are partially of the nature of economic regulations and partially of the nature of social regulations.

Due to the presence of such stringent work rules imposed on businesses with 50or more employees, there are fewer businesses with 50or more employees than businesses with 49or fewer employees.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What would happen to electric companies' profits if regulators were to require them to set the price of electricity equal to the marginal cost of providing each unit of power?

An years past, firms around the world have secretly engaged in collusive agreements to restrain production and push prices above competitive levels.

Evidence compiled by government officials investigating such agreements has revealed that conspiring firms often utilize similar methods of establishing and enforcing collusive restraints of trade. Most agreements, for instance, assign to each firm an allowed market share, a permitted region of operations, or an approved set of customers. In addition, participating firms commonly are required to exchange sales information so that they can monitor adherence to their agreements to restrain trade. In this chapter, you will learn why firms that typically utilize these techniques to formulate and maintain collusive agreements engage in secret conspiracies: Such agreements are illegal under U.S. antitrust laws.

Explain the main rationales for regulation of industries that are not inherently monopolistic

Manufacturing firms based in Columbus, Ohio, and Erie, Pennsylvania, have proposed a merger. If they were to merge, the resulting value of the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index in the nationwide market for the product they produce would rise from 1,400 to 1,800. Under current U.S. antitrust guidelines, would this proposed merger raise concerns for the U.S. Justice Department or Federal Trade Commission?

As noted in the chapter, separating the production of electricity from its delivery has led to considerable deregulation of producers.

a. Briefly explain which of these two aspects of the sale of electricity remains susceptible to natural monopoly problems.

b. Suppose that the potential natural monopoly problem you identified in part (a) actually arises. Why is marginal cost pricing not a feasible solution? What makes average cost pricing a feasible solution?

c. Discuss two approaches that a regulator could use to try to implement an average-cost-pricing solution to the problem identified in part (a).

Consider panel (b) of Figure 27-2. The quantity Q1 is 2,000units, the price P1 is \(2per unit, the average cost AC1 is \)4per unit, and the vertical distance to point C is $6per unit. What is the dollar amount of the losses earned by this natural monopolist when its price is equal to its marginal cost of producing Q1 units?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free