Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Local cable television companies are sometimes granted monopoly rights to service a particular territory of a metropolitan area. The companies typically pay special taxes and licensing fees to local municipalities. Why might municipality give monopoly rights to a cable company?

Short Answer

Expert verified

A municipality grants monopoly rights to a cable company, based on the long-term benefits.

Step by step solution

01

Introduction

Due to large-scale economies of scale and efficiency, a municipality may grant monopoly rights to a single cable service provider.

If a single company provides cable service in a specific area, it may see the falling average cost.

02

Given Information

- Monopoly rights to service a specific territory within a metropolitan area are often granted to local cable television operators.

-Local governments receive special taxes and licensing fees from the businesses.

03

Explanation

A decrease in the average overall cost could aid in service expansion and efficiency. When a company obtains large-scale economies of scale, consumers benefit.

As a result, a municipality grants monopoly rights to a cable company, based on the long-term benefits.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider the following fictitious sales data (in thousands of dollars) for both e-books and physical books. Firms have numbers instead of names, and Firm 1generates only e-book sales. Suppose that antitrust authorities' initial evaluation of whether a single firm may possess "monopoly power" is whether its share of sales in the relevant market exceeds 70percent.

a. Suppose that the antitrust authorities determine that selling physical books and e-book selling are individually separate relevant markets. Does an initial evaluation suggest that any single firm has monopoly power, as defined by the antitrust authorities?

b. Suppose that in fact there is really only a single book industry, in which firms compete in selling both physical books and e-books. According to the antitrust authorities' initial test of the potential for monopoly power, is there actually cause for concern?

Why do you suppose that nearly all of the world's antitrust authorities agree that collusive conspiracies to restrain trade and fix prices are illegal?

Why do you think that many firms with lengthy truck routes now try to recruit married couples to drive their trucks?

Why do you suppose that the U.S. Transportation Department has been considering new regulations mandating that states construct parking facilities for trucks?

A bank in Austin, Texas, has allowed its state banking license, under which it had been regulated by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, a U.S. bank regulator, to expire. It has switched to a federal banking license, under which it is now regulated by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, another bank regulator. Do these regulators subject the bank to social or economic regulation?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free