Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Chapter 27: Q. 1- For Critical Thinking (page 619)

Why do you suppose that assigning market shares, regions, or customers and exchanging sales information are the most common means of coordinating collusion?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Collusion is indeed a non-competitive, secretive, and sometimes illegal agreement between competitors to disrupt market equilibrium. This may include: consented to raise consumer prices, supplier-retailer deals, and monopoly pricing, in which retailers band with each other to reduce the amount paid to suppliers.

Step by step solution

01

Introduction.

When an individual or organization decides to satisfy a need or urge by exchanging money, goods, or services, an exchange process occurs. It's as simple as that, and you engage in exchange relationships all the time.

02

Coordinating collusion.

Complicity is a non-competitive, secretive, and sometimes illegal agreement between competitors to disrupt market equilibrium.

Collusion occurs when people or businesses that would normally compete with one another conspire to work together just to gain unfair market advantage.

03

Reason for Coordinating collusion.

Collusion allows firms to increase profits at the expense of consumers while decreasing market competitiveness.

This could include:

  • Agreeing to raise prices for consumers.
  • Suppliers and retailers make deals.
  • Monopoly pricing occurs when retailers band together to reduce the amount paid to suppliers.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider the following fictitious sales data (in thousands of dollars) for both e-books and physical books. Firms have numbers instead of names, and Firm 1generates only e-book sales. Suppose that antitrust authorities' initial evaluation of whether a single firm may possess "monopoly power" is whether its share of sales in the relevant market exceeds 70percent.

a. Suppose that the antitrust authorities determine that selling physical books and e-book selling are individually separate relevant markets. Does an initial evaluation suggest that any single firm has monopoly power, as defined by the antitrust authorities?

b. Suppose that in fact there is really only a single book industry, in which firms compete in selling both physical books and e-books. According to the antitrust authorities' initial test of the potential for monopoly power, is there actually cause for concern?

An years past, firms around the world have secretly engaged in collusive agreements to restrain production and push prices above competitive levels.

Evidence compiled by government officials investigating such agreements has revealed that conspiring firms often utilize similar methods of establishing and enforcing collusive restraints of trade. Most agreements, for instance, assign to each firm an allowed market share, a permitted region of operations, or an approved set of customers. In addition, participating firms commonly are required to exchange sales information so that they can monitor adherence to their agreements to restrain trade. In this chapter, you will learn why firms that typically utilize these techniques to formulate and maintain collusive agreements engage in secret conspiracies: Such agreements are illegal under U.S. antitrust laws.

Explain the main rationales for regulation of industries that are not inherently monopolistic

Prices of tickets for seats on commercial passenger planes are typically in the hundreds of dollars, whereas trips often can be made by automobile at lower cost. Accident rates per person per trip in the airline industry are considerably lower than auto accident rates per person per trip. Based on these facts, discuss how regulatory costs and benefits may help to explain why government regulations require children to be placed in safety seats in automobiles but not on commercial passenger planes.

A bank in Austin, Texas, has allowed its state banking license, under which it had been regulated by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, a U.S. bank regulator, to expire. It has switched to a federal banking license, under which it is now regulated by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, another bank regulator. Do these regulators subject the bank to social or economic regulation?

Why do you suppose that a growing number of behavioral economists are calling for adoption of more pragmatic approaches to formulating regulations? Explain briefly.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free