Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Suppose the panel (a) of the figure applies to Pennsylvania's steel market. Suppose that steel manufacturer in this state adopts a new technique for producing steel that entails a smaller external cost. In the absence of any government action to correct the negative externality from steel production, would the overallocation of resources to steel production in Pennslyvania be larger or smaller following the adoption of the next steel-manufacturing technique?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The overallocation of resources to steel production would be larger in the adoption of the next steel-manufacturing technique.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1. Given Information

The graph for the steel market is,

02

Step 2. The overallocation of resources.

The overallocation of resources to steel production would be larger in the adoption of the next steel-manufacturing technique. The overallocation would increase as the new technique will attract a larger number of producers.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose that the current price of a tablet device is 300andthatpeoplearebuying1milliondevicesperyear.Thegovernmentdecidestobeginsubsidizingthepurchaseofnewtabletdevices.Thegovernmentbelievesthattheappropriatepriceis260 per tablet, so the program offers to send people cash for the difference between \(260 and whatever the people pay for each tablet they buy.

(a) If no consumers change their tablet-buying behavior, how much will this program cost the taxpayers?

(b) Will the subsidy cause people to buy more, fewer, or the same number of tablets? Explain.

(c) Suppose that people end up buying 1.5 million tablets once the program is in place. If the market price of tablets does not change, how much will this program cost the taxpayers?

(d) Under the assumption that the program causes people to buy 1.5 million tablets and also causes the market price of tablets to rise to \)320, how much will this program cost the taxpayers?

Why do you think that the federal government requires rail operators to mount expensive horns and sound them at prescribed decibel levels at all street crossings?

Explain how market failures such as externalities might justify economic functions of the government.

Suppose that the U.S. government determines that cigarette smoking creates social costs not reflected in the current market price and equilibrium quantity of cigarettes. A study has recommended that the government can correct the externality effect of cigarette consumption by paying farmers not to plant tobacco used to manufacture cigarettes. It also recommends raising the funds to make these payments by increasing taxes on cigarettes. Assuming that the government is correct that cigarette smoking creates external costs, evaluate whether the studyโ€™s recommended policies might help correct this negative externality.

Analyze how public spending programs such as Medicare and spending on public education affect consumption incentives.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free