Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Consider Figure 26-2. Suppose conditions in the industry change in such a way that the amount that each firm makes if it charges a high price when the other firm charges low price increases from \(2million to \)3million. Is the firm's pricing decision altered by this change and, if so, in what way? Explain briefly.

Short Answer

Expert verified

the firm's pricing decision is unaltered by this change

Step by step solution

Achieve better grades quicker with Premium

  • Unlimited AI interaction
  • Study offline
  • Say goodbye to ads
  • Export flashcards

Over 22 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

01

Given Information

From the above take care of the network, it very well may be gathered that both the organizations will pick low costs as their best technique.

02

Explanation Part (1)

In view of the given result network, we should draw the overhauled framework portraying the adjustment of the sum that each firm makes on the off chance that it charges an exorbitant cost when the other firm charges low-cost increments from $2million to $3million.

Assuming that Firm 2charges an exorbitant cost, Firm 1's best procedure is to charge a low cost as that will give a result of $8million.

03

Explanation Part (2)

Once more, in the event that Firm 2 charges a low value, Firm 1's best system is to charge a low cost as that will give a result of $4million. Thusly, charging a low cost is the prevailing technique of Firm 1.

Essentially, for Firm 2 the prevailing methodology will be to charge a low cost.

In this way, even after the adjustment of the result grid, the value choice of the organizations stays unaltered.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Last weekend, Bob attended the university football game. At the opening kickoff, the crowd stood up. Bob therefore realized that he would have to stand up as well to see the game. For the crowd (not the football team), explain the outcomes of a cooperative game and a non-cooperative game. Explain what Bobs "tit-for-tat strategic behavior" would be if he wished to see the game.

Take a look back at the data regarding the inkjet printer industry in Problem 26-2, and answer the following questions.

a. Suppose that consumer demands for inkjet printers, the prices of which are readily observable in office supply outlets and at Internet sites, are growing at a stable pace. Discuss whether circumstances are favorable to an effort by firms in this industry to form a cartel.

b. If the firms successfully establish a cartel, why will there naturally be pressures for the cartel to break down, either from within or from outside?

Why do we suppose that people with college degrees when earn high hourly incomes have been among the customers of online-dating firms that provide fewer high-quality matches?

What would be the revised HHI value if the top dozen firms decided to conduct a horizontal merger and offer a single "Top 12 Tablet" product?

If a dominant firm cannot maintain a cost advantage over other fringe firms in the industry, why might we anticipate that eventually its "dominance" might disappear? (Hint: What would happen to the number of fringe producers if the dominant firm were to earn economic profits and then what would happen over time to the dominant firm's profits?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free