Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

a. What is the value of the Gini coefficient if area B is twice as large as area A?

b. Suppose that the Lorenz curve becomes more bowed, with the result that area B becomes exactly the same size as area A. What will be the new value of the Gini coefficient?

Short Answer

Expert verified

a.33.33%

b.50%

Step by step solution

Achieve better grades quicker with Premium

  • Unlimited AI interaction
  • Study offline
  • Say goodbye to ads
  • Export flashcards

Over 22 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

01

Given Information

The Gini coefficient is the proportion of the region between the line of amazing equity and the line of wonderful inequality. Greater inequality implies higher coefficient as well as the other way around.

02

Explanation Part (a)

a. We know,Gini CoefficientisA/(A+B)

Area B = 2 Area A

Hence the Gini coefficient is A/(A+B)=A/3A=1/3

which is 33.33%

03

Explanation Part (b)

b. We know,

Area B = Area A

Hence, the Gini coefficient is A/(A+B)=A/2A=1/2

which is50%

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Now suppose that in the situation described in Problem 30-13, the distribution of income changes in such a way that A increases to one-third of the area denoted B. What is the new value of the Gini coefficient?

In which the poverty rate has risen in some years and fallen in others but since 1985 has tended to lie in a range between 10 percent and just over 15 percent. If the government's official poverty rate has been based on an absolute measure of poverty instead of a relative measure, would the data plot have tended generally to have sloped upward over time or to have sloped downward? Explain.

Why do you suppose that choosing other increments besides \(15,000 or \)30,000 can yield even more distributional variations of households within these seven income groupings?

(Hint: what do you think could happen if one were to broaden the income increments to \(100,000 or narrow them to \)5,000 while holding the number of income groups equal to seven?)

Suppose that a nation has implemented a system for applying a tax rate of 2 per cent to the incomes earned by the 10 per cent of its residents with the highest incomes. All funds collected are then transferred directly to the 10 per cent of the nation's residents with the lowest incomes. What is the general effect on the shape of a Lorenz curve based on incomes after collection and redistribution of the tax?

Identify whether each of the following proposed poverty measures is an absolute or relative measure of poverty, and discuss whether poverty could ever be eliminated if that measure were utilized.

a. An inflation-adjusted annual income of \(25,000 for an urban family of four

b. Individuals with annual incomes among the lowest 15 percent

c. An inflation-adjusted annual income of \) 10,000 per person

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free