Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Chapter 13: Q.3 - Problems (page 302)

Assume that MPC = 45when answering the following questions.

a. If government expenditures rise by \( 1 billion, by how much will the aggregate expenditure curve shift upward?

b. If taxes rise by \) 1 billion, by how much will the aggregate expenditure curve shift downward?

c. If both taxes and government expenditures rise by $ 1 billion, by how much will the aggregate expenditure curve shift? What will happen to the equilibrium level of real GDP?

d. How does your response to the second question in part (c) change if MPC = 34? If MPC =12?

Short Answer

Expert verified

a. by$5trillion

b. by$4billion

c. by $5trillion

d. by 1

Step by step solution

01

introduction

Tax multiplier addresses sway on Real Output because of progress in the Tax rate.

Government Multiplier addresses change in Real GDP because of progress in Government Expenditure

02

explanation part (a)

Given,

government expenditures rise byG=$1billion

MPC = 0.8

Now, government multiplier =

ΔYΔG=11MPCΔY1=110.8

Y=5trillion

aggregate expenditure curve shift upward by$1billion

03

explanation part (b)

Given,

MPC = 0.8

MPS = 0.2

Tax multiplier =

YT=MPCMPS

role="math" localid="1651986364126" Y=0.80.2=4billion

04

explanation part (c)

Given,

MPC =0.8

MPS = 0.2

Overall impact = increased output due to government expenditure - reduced output due to government expenditure

5-4=1

There is an increase in output by$1trillion

05

explanation part (d)

Given,

MPC = 34

MPS = 134=14

Now calculating,

MPC1MPC+11MPC=1

ΔG+ΔT=1

Adding tax and government multiplier,

MPC1MPC+11MPC

MPC+11MPC=1MPC1MPC=1

ΔG+ΔT=1

increase in the output remains the same i.e1

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Determine whether each of the following is an example of an automatic fiscal stabilizer.

a. A federal agency must extend loans to businesses whenever an economic downturn begins.

b. As the economy heats up, the resulting increase in equilibrium real GDP per year immediately results in higher income tax payments, which dampen consumption spending somewhat.

c. As the economy starts to recover from a severe recession and more people go back to work, government-funded unemployment compensation payments begin to decline.

d. To stem an overheated economy, the president, using special powers granted by Congress, authorizes emergency impoundment of funds that Congress had previously authorized for spending on govemment programs.

Explain how time lags in discretionary fiscal policy making could thwart the efforts of Congress and the president to stabilize real GDP in the face of an economic downturn. Is it possible that these time lags could actually cause the discretionary fiscal policy to destabilize real GDP?

Use traditional Keynesian analysis to evaluate the effects of discretionary fiscal policies.

Suppose that Congress and the president decide that the nation's economic performance is weakening and that the government should "do something" about the situation. They make no tax changes but do enact new laws increasing government spending on a variety of programs.

a. Prior to the congressional and presidential action, careful studies by government economists indicated that the Keynesian multiplier effect of a rise in government expenditures on equilibrium real GDP per year is equal to 3. In the 12 months since the increase in government spending, however, it has become clear that the actual ultimate effect on real GDP will be less than half of that amount. What factors might account for this?

b. Another year and a half elapses following passage of the government spending boost. The government has undertaken no additional policy actions, nor have there been any other events of significance. Nevertheless, by the end of the second year, real GDP has returned to its original level, and the price level has increased sharply, Provide a possible explanation for this outcome.

In Figure 13-6, explain why a budget deficit naturally tends to rise at a real GDP level such as Y2to the left of Yf.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free