Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Every 1-percentage-point increase in the marginal income tax rate induces some workers to supply less labour, which cuts real GDP by \( 0.2 trillion. At the same time, each 1-percentage point increase in the marginal income tax rate causes spendable income to drop, which induces some workers to supply labour that yields \) 0.1 trillion more in real GDP. Is the net outcome consistent with the supply-side theory? Why?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Yes, the net outcome consistent with the supply-side theory

Step by step solution

01

introduction

The supply-side hypothesis is a macroeconomic hypothesis that accepts that monetary development in an economy can be upgraded by decreasing minor expense rates and eliminating guidelines on organizations.

02

explanation

Whenever negligible assessment rates are diminished, two restricting powers work on work supply:

1. Laborers will work more as they get to keep a more noteworthy piece of their profit.

2. Laborers decline the quantity of hours set forth at the effort as their way of life improves with lower negligible assessment rates.

Subsequently, the net consequence of the expansion in peripheral expense rate is an abatement in real GDP and a net outcome consistent with the supply-side theory.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider the accompanying diagram, in which the current short-run equilibrium is at point A, and answer the questions that follow:

a. What type of gap exists at point A?

b. If the marginal propensity to consume equals 0.75, what change in government spending financed by borrowing from the private sector could eliminate the gap identified in part (a)? Explain.

Suppose that Congress enacts a lump-sum tax cut of $750 billion. The marginal propensity to consume is equal to 0.75. Assuming that Ricardian equivalence holds true, what is the effect on equilibrium real GDP? On saving?

1. Other things being equal, what features of a nation's economy do you think would tend to contribute to a higher value for its stabilization coefficient? [Hint: Consider the chapter's discussion of the reasons fiscal policy actions tend to have larger effects on real GDP.)

The U.S. government is in the midst of spending more than \(1 billion on seven buildings containing more than 100,000 square feet of space to be used for the study of infectious diseases. Prior to the government's decision to construct these buildings, a few universities had been planning to build essentially the same facilities using privately obtained funds. After construction on the government buildings began, however, the universities dropped their plans. Evaluate whether the government's \)1 billion expenditure is actually likely to push U.S. real GDP above the level it would have reached in the absence of the government's construction spree.

Based on Schwinn's conclusions, is the government likely to be able to boost real GDP with an increase in government spending if it has raised and lowered its expenditures a number of times in previous months? Explain your reasoning.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free