Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Recall that the Keynesian spending multiplier equals 1 /(1-MPC). Suppose that in panel (b) of Figure 13-1, the government knows that the MPC is equal to 0.75 and that the amount of the horizontal distance that the AD curve had to be shifted directly leftward from point E1 was equal to $1.0 trillion. What is the reduction in real government spending required to have generated this shift?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The reduction in real government spending required is$0.25trillion

Step by step solution

01

introduction

Spending Multiplier: It is a proportion of the degree to which GDP changes because of an adjustment of arranged venture spending or government spending. Marginal Propensity to Consume alludes to the extent of the absolute expansion in discretionary cash flow that families give to utilization.

02

explanation

We know,

MPC = 0.75

The spending multiplier can be calculated as,

role="math" localid="1651935485004" =11MPC=110.75=4

the decline in government expenditure beGand leftward shift on the AD curve beAD=$1trilion

the decline in government expenditure

role="math" localid="1651935751198" ΔG=ΔADspending multiplier=14=0.25

The reduction in real government spending required is$0.25trillion

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Recall that the Keynesian spending multiplier equals 1 /(1-MPC). Suppose that in panel (a) of Figure 13-1, the government determined that the amount by which the AD curve had to be shifted directly rightward from the point E1 was equal to \(1.0 trillion. If the government decided that a \)0.2 trillion increase in real government spending was required to generate this shift, what must be the value of the MPC?

It is late 2019 , and the U.S. economy is showing signs of slipping into a potentially deep recession. Government policymakers are searching for income-tax-policy changes that will bring about a significant and lasting boost to real consumption spending. According to the logic of the permanent income hypothesis, should the proposed income-tax-policy changes involve tax increases or tax reductions, and should the policy changes be short-lived or long-lasting?

The U.S. government is in the midst of spending more than \(1 billion on seven buildings containing more than 100,000 square feet of space to be used for the study of infectious diseases. Prior to the government's decision to construct these buildings, a few universities had been planning to build essentially the same facilities using privately obtained funds. After construction on the government buildings began, however, the universities dropped their plans. Evaluate whether the government's \)1 billion expenditure is actually likely to push U.S. real GDP above the level it would have reached in the absence of the government's construction spree.

1. Other things being equal, what features of a nation's economy do you think would tend to contribute to a higher value for its stabilization coefficient? [Hint: Consider the chapter's discussion of the reasons fiscal policy actions tend to have larger effects on real GDP.)

In May and June of 2008, the federal government issued one-time tax rebates - checks returning a small portion of taxes previously paid to millions of U.S residents, and U.S. real disposable income temporarily jumped by nearly $500 billion. Household real consumption spending did not increase in response to the short-lived increase in real disposable income. Explain how the logic of the permanent income hypothesis might help to account for this apparent non relationship between real consumption and real disposable income in the late spring of 2008.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free