Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A government is currently operating with an annual budget deficit of \(40 billion. The government has determined that every \)10 billion reduction in the amount it borrows each year would reduce the market interest rate by 0.1 percentage point. Furthermore, it has determined that every 0.1-percentage-point change in the market interest rate generates a change in planned investment expenditures in the opposite direction equal to \(5 billion. The marginal propensity to consume is 0.75. Finally, the government knows that to eliminate an inflationary gap and take into account the resulting change in the price level, it must generate a net leftward shift in the aggregate demand curve equal to \)40 billion. Assuming that there are no direct expenditure offsets to fiscal policy, how much should the government increase taxes? (Hint: How much new private investment spending is induced by each $10 billion decrease in government spending? )

Short Answer

Expert verified

As a result, the amount of tax hike that reduces aggregate demand by $40 billion is $40 billion.

Step by step solution

01

Introduction 

The given is the annual budget deficit of the government $40billion

The objective is to determine how much should the government increase taxes

02

Explanation  

Every ten-billion-dollar reduction in the amount the government borrows boosts private investment by five-billion-dollars. In other words, for every x reduction in government borrowing, 0.5x dollars is lost in private investment.

0.75 is the marginal propensity to consume.

03

Explanation 

To achieve a net leftward shift of $40 billion in the aggregate demand curve, the government must raise taxes. To put it another way, the government needs to raise taxes to produce a net reduction in aggregate demand of $40 billion.

04

Calculation 

Assume that an increase in taxes of xreduces aggregate demand by $40billion.

Changes in AD are solely related to a tax increase of xdollars.

=-MPC1-MPC×x

=-0.751-0.75×x=-3x

An increase in tax of xdollars will result in a decrease in government borrowing of xdollars, which will result in a decrease in private investment of 0.5xdollars.

Change in $mathrmAD$ as a result of a drop in private investment of 0.5xdollars.

=11-MPC×0.5x

=11-0.75×0.5x=2x

Calculate the value of xas follows:

Total change in AD=-$40billion(-3x)+(2x)=-$40billion

-x=-40billionx=40billion

As a result, a tax increase of $40 billion reduces aggregate demand by $40 billion.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The U.S. government is in the midst of spending more than \(1 billion on seven buildings containing more than 100,000 square feet of space to be used for the study of infectious diseases. Prior to the government's decision to construct these buildings, a few universities had been planning to build essentially the same facilities using privately obtained funds. After construction on the government buildings began, however, the universities dropped their plans. Evaluate whether the government's \)1 billion expenditure is actually likely to push U.S. real GDP above the level it would have reached in the absence of the government's construction spree.

Currently, a government's budget is balanced. The marginal propensity to consume is \(0.80. The government has determined that each additional \)10 billion it borrows to finance a budget deficit pushes up the market interest rate by role="math" localid="1651613391961" 0.1 percentage point. It has also determined that every role="math" localid="1651613378175" 0.1-percentage point change in the market interest rate generates a change in planned investment expenditures equal to \(2 billion. Finally, the government knows that to close a recessionary gap and take into account the resulting change in the price level, it must generate a net rightward shift in the aggregate demand curve equal to \)200 billion. Assuming that there are no direct expenditure offsets to fiscal policy, how much should the government increase its expenditures? (Hint: How much private investment spending will each $10 billion increase in government spending crowd out?)

It is late 2019 , and the U.S. economy is showing signs of slipping into a potentially deep recession. Government policymakers are searching for income-tax-policy changes that will bring about a significant and lasting boost to real consumption spending. According to the logic of the permanent income hypothesis, should the proposed income-tax-policy changes involve tax increases or tax reductions, and should the policy changes be short-lived or long-lasting?

Assume that equilibrium real GDP is \( 18.2 trillion and full-employment equilibrium (F E) is \) 18.55 trillion. The marginal propensity to save is 17. Answer the questions using the data in the following graph.

a. What is the marginal propensity to consume?

b. By how much must new investment or government spending increase to bring the economy up to full employment?

c. By how much must government cut personal taxes to stimulate the economy to the full employment equilibrium?

Determine whether each of the following is an example of discretionary fiscal policy action.

a. A recession occurs, and government-funded unemployment compensation is paid to laid-off workers.

b. Congress votes to fund a new jobs program designed to pat unemployed workers to work.

c. The Federal Reserve decides to reduce the quantity of money in circulation in an effort to slow inflation.

d. Under powers authorized by an act of Congress, the president decides to authorize an emergency release of funds for spending programs intended to head off economic crises.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free