Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The market price of insecticide is initially \(10 per unit. To address a negative externality in this market, the government decides to charge producers of insecticide for the privilege of polluting during the production process. A fee that fully takes into account the social costs of pollution is determined, and once it is put into effect, the market supply curve for insecticide shifts upward by \)4 per unit. The market price of insecticide also increases, to $12per unit. What fee is the government charging insecticide manufacturers?

Short Answer

Expert verified

$4 is the fee charged by the government for insecticide manufacturers.

Step by step solution

01

Calculating the fee charged by the government for insecticide manufacturers.

In addition to the social cost, the government is charging$4per unit. A rightward change in the market supply curve of$4 per unit suggests that the government is charging$4 per unit. The government calculates this fee by taking into account the social cost.

If the government charges $4per unit, the market supply of pesticide increases proportionally. External and private costs are taken into account when determining social cost. The government bases its fee on the social cost of producing pesticides.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The following table displays hypothetical annual total costs and total benefits of conserving wild tigers at several possible worldwide tiger population levels.

a. Calculate the marginal costs and benefits.

b. Given the data, what is the socially optimal world population of wild tigers?

c. Suppose that tiger farming is legalized and that this has the effect of reducing the marginal cost of tiger conservation by $15million for each 2,000-tiger population increment in the table. What is the new socially optimal population of wild tigers?

Consider the diagram below and respond to the questions that follow.

a. Assume that a new technique for decreasing water pollution lowers the marginal cost of pollution reduction at every level of water cleanliness. Will the ideal % degree of water cleanliness rise or decline after this event? Will the cost of the final unit of water cleanup grow or decrease? Include a visual to help you explain your point.

b. Assume that the event described in item (a) occurs, and that medical studies show that the marginal benefit from reducing water pollution is higher at all levels of water purity. Will the ideal % degree of water cleanliness rise or decrease after both events? Can you predict whether the cost of the last unit of water cleanup will increase or decrease as compared to the initial optimum? To help you clarify your answers, create a new diagram.

One possible method for reducing emissions of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide is to inject the gases into deep saltwater-laden rock formations, where they would be trapped for thousands of years. Suppose that the federal government provides a fixed per-unit subsidy to firms that utilize this technology in West Virginia and other locales where such rock formations are known to exist.

a. Consider the effects of the government subsidy on the production and sale of equipment that injects greenhouse gases into underground rock formations. What happens to the market clearing price of such pollution abatement equipment?

b. Who pays to achieve the results discussed in part (a)?

Explain how economists can conceptually determine the optimal quantity of pollution.

One possible method for reducing emissions of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide is to inject the gases into deep saltwater-laden rock formations, where they would be trapped for thousands of years. Suppose that the federal government provides a fixed per-unit subsidy to firms that utilize this technology in West Virginia and other locales where such rock formations are known to exist.

a. Consider the effects of the government subsidy on the production and sale of equipment that injects greenhouse gases into underground rock formations. What happens to the market clearing price of such pollution abatement equipment?

b. Who pays to achieve the results discussed in part (a)?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free