Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

One possible method for reducing emissions of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide is to inject the gases into deep saltwater-laden rock formations, where they would be trapped for thousands of years. Suppose that the federal government provides a fixed per-unit subsidy to firms that utilize this technology in West Virginia and other locales where such rock formations are known to exist.

a. Consider the effects of the government subsidy on the production and sale of equipment that injects greenhouse gases into underground rock formations. What happens to the market clearing price of such pollution abatement equipment?

b. Who pays to achieve the results discussed in part (a)?

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) Government subsidies are likely to lower the market clearing price of pollution abatement equipment.

(b) The government foots the bill for increasing production and lowering the cost of greenhouse gas injection equipment.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1:  Effects on Government subsidy on the production and price

(a) Government subsidies are likely to lower the market clearing price of pollution abatement equipment.

02

Diagrammatical representation

The following graphical representation represents the impact of government subsidies on production and pricing.

The production of equipment that injects greenhouse gases into the earth increases to Q1 from Q, as seen in the graph above. When the government gives subsidies, the price of these items falls as well.

03

Explanation for part (b)

  • The government foots the bill for increasing production and lowering the cost of greenhouse gas injection equipment.
  • These devices have a good environmental impact.
  • If the cost of equipment that injects greenhouse gases into the ground falls, companies will use such equipment in their production processes and ultimately reduce carbon emissions.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The following table gives hypothetical annual total costs and total benefits of maintaining alternative populations of Asian elephants.

a. Calculate the marginal costs and benefits, and draw marginal benefit and cost schedules.

b. Given the data, what is the socially optimal world population of Asian elephants?

c. Suppose that two events occur simultaneously. Technological development allows machines to do more efficiently much of the work that elephants once did, which reduces by \(10million the marginal benefit of maintaining the elephant population for each 7,500increment in the elephant population. In addition, new techniques for breeding, feeding, and protecting elephants reduce the marginal cost by \)40million for each 7,500increment in the elephant population. What is the new socially optimal population of Asian elephants?

The market price of insecticide is initially \(10per unit. To address a negative externality in this market, the government decides to charge producers of insecticide for the privilege of polluting during the production process. A fee that fully takes into account the social costs of pollution is determined, and once it is pat into effect, the market supply curve for insecticide shifts upward by \)4 per unit. The market price of insecticide also increases, to $12 per unit. What fee is the government charging insecticide manufacturers?

Examine the following marginal costs and marginal benefits associated with water cleanliness in a given locale:

a. What is the optimal degree of water cleanliness?

b. What is the optimal degree of water pollution?

c. Suppose that a company creates a food additive that offsets most of the harmful effects of drinking polluted water. As a result, the marginal benefit of water cleanliness declines by $40,000at each degree of water cleanliness at or less than 80 percent. What is the optimal degree of water cleanliness after this change?

The market price of insecticide is initially \(10per unit. To address a negative externality in this market, the government decides to charge producers of insecticide for the privilege of polluting during the production process. A fee that fully takes into account the social costs of pollution is determined, and once it is put into effect, the market supply curve for insecticide shifts upward by \)4per unit. The market price of insecticide also increases, to$12 per unit. What fee is the government charging insecticide manufacturers?

Explain why a society usually would not determine that a degree of 0 per cent air cleanliness is optimal.

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free