Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

One possible method for reducing emissions of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide is to inject the gases into deep saltwater-laden rock formations, where they would be trapped for thousands of years. Suppose that the federal government provides a fixed per-unit subsidy to firms that utilize this technology in West Virginia and other locales where such rock formations are known to exist.

a. Consider the effects of the government subsidy on the production and sale of equipment that injects greenhouse gases into underground rock formations. What happens to the market clearing price of such pollution abatement equipment?

b. Who pays to achieve the results discussed in part (a)?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Part a: The production of equipment that injects greenhouse gases into the earth increases to Q1fromQ .

Part b: If the price of equipments that inject greenhouse gases in to underground decreases, then the carbon emission will be reduced.

Step by step solution

01

The effects government subsidy on the Production and Price (Part a)

a) Government subsidies are likely to lower the market clearing price of pollution abatement equipment. The following diagram depicts the impact of government subsidies on output and pricing.

The production of equipment that injects greenhouse gases into the earth increases to Q1 from Q, as seen in the graph above. When the government gives subsidies, the price of these items falls as well.

02

Step 2:Result discussed in Part a (Part b)

(b) The government foots the bill for increasing production and lowering the cost of greenhouse gas injection equipment. These devices have a good environmental impact.

If the cost of equipment that injects greenhouse gases into the ground falls, more companies will utilise such equipment in their manufacturing processes, lowering carbon emissions.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A government agency caps aggregate emissions of an air pollutant within its borders, establishes initial pollution allowances across all firms, and grants the firms the right to trade these allowances among themselves. The demand and supply curves for these pollution allowances have normal shapes and intersect at a positive price. Explain in your own words the government's likely goal in establishing this private market for pollution allowances.

Examine the following marginal costs and marginal benefits associated with water cleanliness in a given locale:

a. What is the optimal degree of water cleanliness?

b. What is the optimal degree of water pollution?

c. Suppose that a company creates a food additive that offsets most of the harmful effects of drinking polluted water. As a result, the marginal benefit of water cleanliness declines by $40,000at each degree of water cleanliness at or less than 80 percent. What is the optimal degree of water cleanliness after this change?

The market price of insecticide is initially \(10per unit. To address a negative externality in this market, the government decides to charge producers of insecticide for the privilege of polluting during the production process. A fee that fully takes into account the social costs of pollution is determined, and once it is pat into effect, the market supply curve for insecticide shifts upward by \)4 per unit. The market price of insecticide also increases, to $12 per unit. What fee is the government charging insecticide manufacturers?

Suppose that a new chief of the government agency discussed in the problem decides to reduce the number of pollution allowances that firms are permitted to own. Evaluate the effects this policy change will have on the market price of pollution allowances and discuss whether the policy appears to be fully consistent with the original intent of creating the market for these allowances.

Why might a low-income nation with a currently very high degree of air cleanliness view a higher pollution level created by newly relocated plants of Chinese firms as optimal?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free