Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Chapter 16: Q.3 - Problems (page 373)

Assume that the following conditions exist :

a. All banks are fully loaned up - there are no excess reserves, and desired excess reserves are always zero.

b. The money multiplier is 3.

c. The planned investment schedule is such that at a 6percent rate of interest, the investment is \(1200billion; at 5 percent, investment is \)1225billion

d. The investment multiplier is 3.

e. The initial equilibrium level of real GDP is \(18trillion.

f. The equilibrium rate of interest is 6percent.

Now the Fed engages in expansionary monetary policy. It buys \)1billion worth of bonds, which increases the money supply, which in turn lowers the market rate of interest by 1percentage point. Determine how much money supply must have increased, and then trace out the numerical consequences of the associated reduction in interest rates on all the other variables mentioned.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Bonds bought of $1 billion Increase inmoney supply by $3billion, decrease interest rate by 1%โ€‰& increases investmentby $25billion, and raisesincome by $75 billion

Step by step solution

01

Investment Multiplier 

Change in investment due to change in interest rates can be calculated by =

(1225-1200)/(6-5). So, 1%change in interest rates leads to $25billion change in investment.

Investment multiplier shows multiple times increase in income due to change in income.

Formula = Change in Income/ Change in Investment

So, change in Income =3x25=$75 billion

02

Money Multiplier Concept 

Money multiplier shows the multiple times increase in money supply due to change in government monetary policy (FOMC bonds buying here).

Money Multiplier = Money supply change / Monetary policy change (bonds' purchase)

As money multiplier = 3, bonds purchase value = $1billion

So, 3= Money supply change /1

Money supply change = 3x1=$3billion dollars

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

On the basis of Problem 16-1, imagine that initially the market interest rate is 5 per cent and at this interest rate you have decided to hold half of your financial wealth like bonds and half as holdings of non-interest-bearing money. You notice that the market interest rate is starting to rise, however, and you become convinced that it will ultimately rise to 10 per cent.

a. In what direction do you expect the value of your bond holdings to go when the interest rate rises?

b. If you wish to prevent the value of your financial wealth from declining in the future, how should you adjust the way you split your wealth between bonds and money? What does this imply about the demand for money?

What do you think might be lost-and by whom - if the Fed were to follow an easily understood rule as a guide for conducting monetary policy? Explain.

Suppose that each 0.1percentage point decrease in the equilibrium interest rate induces a \(10billion increase in real planned investment spending by businesses. In addition, the investment multiplier is equal to 5, and the money multiplier is equal to 4. Furthermore, every \)20billion increase in money supply brings about 0.1percentage point reduction in the equilibrium interest rate. Use this information to answer the following questions under the assumption that all other things are equal.

a. How much must real planned investment increase if the Federal Reserve desires to bring about a $100billion increase in equilibrium real GDP ?

b. How much must he money supply change for the Fed to induce the change in real planned investment calculated in part (a) ?

c. What dollar amount of open market operations must the Fed undertake to bring about the money supply change calculated in part (b) ?

Evaluate how expansionary and contractionary monetary policy actions affect equilibrium real GDP and the price level in the short run.

Take a look at Figure 16-3. Discuss a policy action that the Trading Desk at Federal Reserve Bank of New York could undertake in order to bring about the increase in aggregate demand displayed in the figure

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free