Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

On the basis of Problem 16-1, imagine that initially the market interest rate is 5 per cent and at this interest rate you have decided to hold half of your financial wealth like bonds and half as holdings of non-interest-bearing money. You notice that the market interest rate is starting to rise, however, and you become convinced that it will ultimately rise to 10 per cent.

a. In what direction do you expect the value of your bond holdings to go when the interest rate rises?

b. If you wish to prevent the value of your financial wealth from declining in the future, how should you adjust the way you split your wealth between bonds and money? What does this imply about the demand for money?

Short Answer

Expert verified

a. The value of your bond holdings to go when the interest rate rises will fall

b. You would choose non-interest yielding money to bonds.

Step by step solution

01

introduction 

A non-maturing bond is a non-redeemable bond with no development date. These bonds are treated as value, not obligation and pay a constant flow of interest instalments for eternity.

02

explanation part (a)

We know,

Net income of bond = I

nominal rate = r

Po=Ir

At r = 0.05

Po=I0.05

At r = 0.10

P0=I0.10

The value of your bond holdings to go when the interest rate rises will fall with rising discount rates.

03

explanation part (b)

As the discount rate increases the current worth of the security falls. In the event that you need the current worth of your monetary abundance from declining in future, you would incline toward non-premium yielding money to securities. Your growth strategy would incorporate less abundance in unendingness and a rising part in money.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose that the economy currently is in long-run equilibrium. Explain the short- and long-run adjustments that will take place in an aggregate demand-aggregate supply diagram if the Fed expands the quantity of money in circulation.

Suppose that each 0.1percentage point increase in the equilibrium interest rate induces a \(5billion decrease in real planned investment spending by businesses. In addition, the investment multiplier is equal to 4, and the money multiplier is equal to 3. Furthermore, every \)9billion decrease in money supply brings about 0.1-percentage-point increase in the equilibrium interest rate. Use this information to answer the following questions under the assumption that all other things are equal.

a. How much must real planned investment decrease if the Federal Reserve desires to bring about an $80billion decrease in equilibrium real GDP ?

b. How much must the money supply change for the Fed to induce the change in real planned investment calculated in part (a)?

c. What dollar amount of open market operations must the Fed undertake to bring about the money supply change calculated in part (b) ?

Consider the following data: The money supply is \(1 trillion, the price level equals 2, and real GDP is \)5 trillion in base-year dollars. What is the income velocity of money?

Suppose that the quantity of money in circulation is fixed but the income velocity of money doubles. If real GDP remains at its long-run potential level, what happens to the equilibrium price level?

Explain why the net export effect of a contractionary monetary policy reinforces the usual impact that monetary policy has on equilibrium real GDP per year in the short run.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free