Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

During an interval between mid-2010 and early 2011, the Federal Reserve embarked on a policy it termed "quantitative easing." Total reserves in the banking system increased. Hence, the Federal Reserve's liabilities to banks increased, and at the same time, its assets rose as it purchased more assets-many of which were securities with private market values that had dropped considerably. The money multiplier declined, so the net increase in the money supply was negligible. Indeed, during a portion of the period, the money supply actually declined before rising near its previous value. Evaluate whether the Fed's "quantitative easing" was a monetary policy or credit policy action.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The Fed's "quantitative easing" was a credit policy action

Step by step solution

01

introduction

Credit Policy is utilized by the national bank to impact the credit market in the economy. With the assistance of credit strategy, the national bank attempts to change the market interest for loanable assets in the credit market.

02

explanation part (1)

At the point when the complete stores in the financial framework expanded, they were having abundance holds. Rather than giving advances to clients, they stopped their abundance holds with the national bank to procure revenue from a national bank.

03

explanation part (2)

Along these lines, the responsibility of the national bank expanded and the money supply in the market additionally dropped. Subsequently, the stock of loanable assets in the credit market diminished.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose that following adjustment to the events in Problem 16-8, the Fed cuts the money supply in half. How does the price level now compare with its value before the income velocity and the money supply change?

Consider the two panels of Figure 16-2. Suppose that instructions in the latest FOMC Directive call for a monetary policy action aimed at pushing down the rate of interest prevailing in the economy. Use the appropriate panel of the figure to assist in explaining whether officials at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York's Trading Desk should buy or sell existing bonds.

Consider the data in Problem 16-10. Suppose that the money supply increases by $ 100 billion and real GDP and the income velocity remain unchanged.

a. According to the quantity theory of money and prices, what is the new equilibrium price level after full adjustment to the increase in the money supply?

b. What is the percentage increase in the money supply?

c. What is the percentage change in the price level?

d. How do the percentage changes in the money supply and price level compare?

Suppose that each 0.1percentage point increase in the equilibrium interest rate induces a \(5billion decrease in real planned investment spending by businesses. In addition, the investment multiplier is equal to 4, and the money multiplier is equal to 3. Furthermore, every \)9billion decrease in money supply brings about 0.1-percentage-point increase in the equilibrium interest rate. Use this information to answer the following questions under the assumption that all other things are equal.

a. How much must real planned investment decrease if the Federal Reserve desires to bring about an $80billion decrease in equilibrium real GDP ?

b. How much must the money supply change for the Fed to induce the change in real planned investment calculated in part (a)?

c. What dollar amount of open market operations must the Fed undertake to bring about the money supply change calculated in part (b) ?

What do you suppose might be gained-and by whom-if the Fed were to follow an easily understood rule as a guide for conducting monetary policy? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free