Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Chapter 16: Q.1 Critical Thinking Questions (page 365)

What do you suppose might be gained-and by whom-if the Fed were to follow an easily understood rule as a guide for conducting monetary policy? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified

if the Fed were to follow an easily understood rule as a guide for conducting monetary policy then it would-be no one's benefit assuming that the strategy becomes inadequate or on the other hand assuming the public authority's endeavour to diminish joblessness brings about additional expansion and an expansion in the business.

Step by step solution

01

introduction

Whenever a policy is to such an extent that individuals expect it by utilizing all suitable data, then, at that point, the arrangement becomes incapable.

02

explanation

On the off chance that the Fed were to observe an effectively perceived guideline, it will be simple for individuals to expect the Fed's approach activity. Both objective assumptions speculation and strategy unimportance recommendation let us that know if a policy becomes expected then it consequently becomes insufficient even in the short-run.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose that each 0.1percentage point decrease in the equilibrium interest rate induces a \(10billion increase in real planned investment spending by businesses. In addition, the investment multiplier is equal to 5, and the money multiplier is equal to 4. Furthermore, every \)20billion increase in money supply brings about 0.1percentage point reduction in the equilibrium interest rate. Use this information to answer the following questions under the assumption that all other things are equal.

a. How much must real planned investment increase if the Federal Reserve desires to bring about a $100billion increase in equilibrium real GDP ?

b. How much must he money supply change for the Fed to induce the change in real planned investment calculated in part (a) ?

c. What dollar amount of open market operations must the Fed undertake to bring about the money supply change calculated in part (b) ?

During an interval between mid-2010 and early 2011, the Federal Reserve embarked on a policy it termed "quantitative easing." Total reserves in the banking system increased. Hence, the Federal Reserve's liabilities to banks increased, and at the same time, its assets rose as it purchased more assets-many of which were securities with private market values that had dropped considerably. The money multiplier declined, so the net increase in the money supply was negligible. Indeed, during a portion of the period, the money supply actually declined before rising near its previous value. Evaluate whether the Fed's "quantitative easing" was a monetary policy or credit policy action.

Take a look at Figure 16-3. Discuss a policy action that the Trading Desk at Federal Reserve Bank of New York could undertake in order to bring about the increase in aggregate demand displayed in the figure

Assume that the following conditions exist :

a. All banks are fully loaned up - there are no excess reserves, and desired excess reserves are always zero.

b. The money multiplier is 4.

c. The planned investment schedule is such that at a 4percent rate of interest, investment is \(1400billion. At 5percent, investment is \)1380billion.

d. The investment multiplier is 5.

e. The initial equilibrium level of real GDP is \(19trillion.

f. The equilibrium rate of interest is 4percent.

Now the Fed engages in contractionary monetary policy. It sells \)2billion worth of bonds, which reduces the money supply, which in turn raises the market rate of interest by 1 percentage point. Determine how much the money supply must have decreased, and then trace out numerical consequences of the associated increase in interest rates on all other variables mentioned.

Why do you suppose that corporate cash holdings have decreased slightly since 2015?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free