Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

If the federal government were to try to borrow more in future years to expand its capability to boost discretionary spending, what would likely happen to its net interest costs?

Short Answer

Expert verified

A one-time tax increase will never be enough to remove it. Rather than paying down debts, the government can opt to spend more.

Step by step solution

01

Introduction

A large percentage of Americans pay property taxes based on the property's fair market value. Taxes are levied on a wide range of assets by citizens of other countries.

For example, in country F, there is a solidarity tax on wealth above a specific amount of total net worth.

The marginal rate varies between0.5and 1.5percent. People who have greater wealth pay more taxes than those who have not.

02

Step 2:  Explanation

However, the International Monetary Fund recently proposed that a one-time wealth tax be implemented.

This is true not only for wealthy individuals, but also for any household with a positive net worth.

In order to lower the existing enormous public debt, the IMF will take around ten percent of income from anybody who has something to tax (once).

This does not guarantee that a one-time wealth tax will eliminate the deficit fully. It will never be eliminated by a one-time tax hike. Instead of paying down debts, the government can choose to increase spending.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose that the share of U.S. GDP going to domestic consumption remains constant. Initially, the federal government was operating with a balanced budget, but this year it has increased its spending well above its collections of taxes and other sources of revenues. To fund its deficit spending, the government has issued bonds. So far, very few foreign residents have shown any interest in purchasing the bonds.

a. What must happen to induce foreign residents to buy the bonds?

b. If foreign residents desire to purchase the bonds, what is the most important source of dollars to buy them?

In 2019, government spending is\(4.3trillion, and taxes collected are\)3.9 trillion. What is the federal government deficit in that year?

Take a look at the most recent years of data on the net public debt displayed in Figure 14-3, and then examine the most recent years of data on federal budget deficits shown in Figure 14-2. Why do you suppose that the net public debt as a percentage of GDP has grown more slowly recently than was the case between 2008 and 2015 ?

A fraction of the funds borrowed by the federal government between 2008 and 2015 were utilized to fund public investments in a number of solar power companies that produced little output and halted operations. These concerns provided no repayments to the government. In what sense might this fraction of deficit spending arguably have imposed a "burden" on future generations?

Why might nations' governments earn lower-than-anticipated revenues from asset sales if all governments offered similar assets for sale simultaneously? (Hint: What would happen to asset supplies and market clearing prices if all governments sought to sell substantial numbers of the same types of assets?)

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free