Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In each of the past few years, the federal government has regularly borrowed funds to pay for at least one-third of expenditures that tax revenues were insufficient to cover. More than60percent

of all federal expenditures now go for entitlement spending. What does this fact imply about how the government is paying for most of its discretionary expenditures?

Short Answer

Expert verified

As an outcome, the government is forced to borrow to fund the bulk of its consumption expenditure.

Step by step solution

01

Introduction

With entitlement expenditures accounting for more than60% of federal spending, discretionary spending accounts for only around40% of total spending. At the same time, the income generated is only enough to cover about 2/3rd of federal spending, or about 67 percent.

02

Explanation

If we assume that the government allocates tax revenue to discretionary spending after funding entitlement spending.

Then tax revenue can only fund around 67percent of federal expenditure and entitlement spending is around 60percent, leaving very little tax revenue (in terms of percentage) for discretionary spending.

As a result, the government has little choice except to borrow to cover the majority of its discretionary spending.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

If the federal government were to try to borrow more in future years to expand its capability to boost discretionary spending, what would likely happen to its net interest costs?

In 2019, government spending is\(4.3trillion, and taxes collected are\)3.9 trillion. What is the federal government deficit in that year?

Suppose that the economy is experiencing the short-run equilibrium position depicted at point Bin the diagram below. Explain the short-run effects of an increase in the government deficit on equilibrium real GDPand the equilibrium price level. What will be the long-run effects?

To eliminate the deficit (and halt the growth of the net public debt), a politician suggests that "we should tax the rich." "The politician makes a simple arithmetic calculation in which he applies a higher tax rate to the total income reported by "the rich" in a previous year. He says that the government could thereby solve the deficit problem by taxing "the rich."What is the major fallacy in such a claim?

Explain how each of the following will affect the net public debt, other things being equal.

a. Previously, the government operated with a balanced budget, but recently there has been a sudden increase in federal tax collections.

b. The government had been operating with a very small annual budget deficit until three hurricanes hit the Atlantic Coast, and now government spending has risen substantially.

c. The Government National Mortgage Association, a federal government agency that purchases certain types of home mortgages, buys U.S. Treasury bonds from another government agency.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free