Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Consider Figure 12-7, which applies to an economy in which the marginal propensity to consume is 0.8. Why does a \(0.1 trillion increase in planned real investment spending cause the aggregate demand curve to shift rightward by exactly \)0.5 trillion at the initial equilibrium price level of 110?

Short Answer

Expert verified

It is due to the multiplier effect

Step by step solution

01

introduction

Multiplier estimates the impact of an adjustment of any exogenous variable fair and square of GDP or result. It shows how much the total result (Y) changes for a given change in independent variables, for example, investment, government spending, and so forth.

02

explanation

We know,

change in autonomous variables = A

change in real GDP = Y

mpc = marginal propensity to consume

Multiplier size = ΔY=ΔA1mpc

localid="1651931995158" ΔYΔA=10.2=5

Change in income = 5×0.1= $5trillion

This causes the aggregate demand curve to shift rightward by exactly $0.5trillion at the initial equilibrium price level of110

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Given each of the following values for the multiplier, calculate both the MPCand the MPS..

a. 20

b.10

c. 8

d. 5

Consider the current equilibrium real GDP level of \( 18.0 trillion displayed in Table 12-2. Based on your answer to Problem 4, if real government spending were to decrease by \)1.0 trillion, what would be the resulting change in real GDP? What would be the new equilibrium level of real GDP? Verify that at the new level of government spending, this new equilibrium real GDP equals C+I+G+NX.

At various times in the past-the early 1980 s, early 1990 s, early 2000 s, and late 2000 s-business profit expectations plummeted, and firms cut back on their investment spending. The ratio of total investment spending to companies' aggregate profit flows decreased markedly. In each instance, real GDP declined, and the U.S. economy fell into recession. At the end of the recession intervals of the early 1980 s, early1990 s, and early 2000 s, business profit expectations improved. Firms responded by boosting their investment spending, and both real GDP and the ratio of investment expenditures to firms' profits recovered fully. At the conclusion of the late-2000s recession, however, this ratio failed to return to its previous level. By the time you have completed this chapter, you will understand why the result during this current decade has been a sluggish improvement in real GDP and, hence, an unusually slow economic recovery.

Evaluate why autonomous changes in total planned expenditures have a multiplier effect on equilibrium real GDP

Consider the table below when answering the following questions. For this hypothetical economy, the marginal propensity to save is constant at all levels of real GDP, and investment spending is autonomous. There is no government.

a. Complete the table. What is the marginal propensity to save? What is the marginal propensity to consume?

b. Draw a graph of the consumption function. Then add the investment function to obtain C+I.

c. Under the graph of C+I, draw another graph showing the saving and investment curves. Note that the C+Icurve crosses the 45-degree reference line in the upper graph at the same level of realGDPwhere the saving and investment curves cross in the lower graph. (If not, redraw your graphs.) What is this level of real GDP?

d. What is the numerical value of the multiplier?

e. What is equilibrium real GDPwithout investment? What is the multiplier effect from the inclusion of investment?

f. What is the average propensity to consume at equilibrium real GDP?

g. If autonomous investment declines from \(400to \)200, what happens to equilibrium real GDP?

Following the rightward shift in the aggregate demand curve generated by the \( 0.1 trillion rises in real planned investment spending in Problem 12-18, why does the actual equilibrium level of real GDP increase by only \)0.3 trillion instead of $0.5 trillion?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free