Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Consider Figure 12-7, which applies to an economy in which the marginal propensity to consume is 0.8. Why does a \(0.1 trillion increase in planned real investment spending cause the aggregate demand curve to shift rightward by exactly \)0.5 trillion at the initial equilibrium price level of 110?

Short Answer

Expert verified

It is due to the multiplier effect

Step by step solution

01

introduction

Multiplier estimates the impact of an adjustment of any exogenous variable fair and square of GDP or result. It shows how much the total result (Y) changes for a given change in independent variables, for example, investment, government spending, and so forth.

02

explanation

We know,

change in autonomous variables = A

change in real GDP = Y

mpc = marginal propensity to consume

Multiplier size = ΔY=ΔA1mpc

localid="1651931995158" ΔYΔA=10.2=5

Change in income = 5×0.1= $5trillion

This causes the aggregate demand curve to shift rightward by exactly $0.5trillion at the initial equilibrium price level of110

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

At various times in the past-the early 1980s, early1990s, early 2000s, and late 2000s-business profit expectations plummeted, and firms cut back on their investment spending. The ratio of total investment spending to companies' aggregate profit flows decreased markedly. In each instance, real GDP declined, and the U.S. economy fell into recession. At the end of the recession intervals of the early1980s, early 1990s, and early 2000s, business profit expectations improved. Firms responded by boosting their investment spending, and both real GDP and the ratio of investment expenditures to firms' profits recovered fully. At the conclusion of the late-2000s recession, however, this ratio failed to return to its previous level. By the time you have completed this chapter, you will understand why the result during this current decade has been a sluggish improvement in real GDP and, hence, an unusually slow economic recovery.

Understand the relationship between total planned expenditures and the aggregate demand curve

In an economy in which the multiplier has a value of 3, the price level has decreased from 115 to 110. As a consequence, there has been a movement along the aggregate demand curve from S18trillion in real GDP to 18.9 trillion in real GDP.

a. What is the marginal propensity to save?

b. What was the amount of the change in planned expenditures generated by the decline in the price level?

Given each of the following values for the multiplier, calculate both the MPCand the MPS..

a. 20

b.10

c. 8

d. 5

Assume that the multiplier in a country is equal to 4and that autonomous real consumption spending is\(1trillion. If current real GDP is\)18trillion, what is the current value of real consumption spending?

Consider Table 12-2. What is the average propensity to consume at the equilibrium level of real GDP? What is the average propensity to save?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free