Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Suppose that firms were expecting inflation to be 3 percent, but then it actually turned out to be 7 percent. Other things equal, firm profits will be: \(L O 38.4\) a. Smaller than expected. b. Larger than expected.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Firm profits will be larger than expected due to unexpected inflation.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Expected vs Actual Inflation

When firms expect a certain percentage of inflation, they set their prices, wages, and contracts based on that expectation. Here, firms expected inflation to be 3%, but it actually turned out to be 7%. This discrepancy affects costs and revenues.
02

Analyzing Costs and Revenue Impact

If inflation is higher than expected, firms generally see rising costs. However, if they have locked in wage rates or other costs expecting only 3% inflation, their costs will increase less than their revenues, assuming they sell their products at prices reflecting the 7% inflation rate.
03

Effect on Firm Profits

Since revenues are likely to increase by 7% due to unexpected inflation, while some costs like wages or fixed contracts increase only by the expected 3%, profits are likely to increase more than expected. This is because the gap between revenue growth (7%) and controlled cost growth (3%) increases.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Expected Inflation
Expected inflation is the rate of inflation that businesses, consumers, and policymakers anticipate over a certain period. Firms often base their financial strategies—such as setting prices, wages, and planning budgets—on these forecasts. In the scenario given, businesses anticipated an inflation rate of 3%. When expected inflation aligns with actual inflation, firms can predict their costs and revenues accurately, allowing them to maintain stable profit margins. This predictability helps firms make informed investment decisions and manage risk effectively.

However, if expectations are inaccurate, it can lead to mismatches in costs and revenues, impacting overall business performance. Firms use various tools to make these predictions, including historical data, economic models, and expert analysis. Properly anticipating inflation helps in mitigating risks associated with rising costs and competitive pricing.
Unexpected Inflation
Unexpected inflation occurs when the actual rate of inflation is higher or lower than what businesses or consumers expected. In this case, inflation turned out to be 7% instead of the anticipated 3%. This scenario can create complications for firms, especially if they have locked in various costs based on expected inflation.

For instance, if a firm has fixed contracts or wage agreements assuming 3% inflation, their costs will not increase as much as revenues if prices reflect the higher 7% inflation. This results in a scenario where revenues can increase more substantially compared to controlled costs.
  • Unexpected high inflation typically means costs rise less quickly than revenues.
  • Firms may face challenges with customer dissatisfaction due to rapid price increases.
  • Firms reliant on borrowing might face higher interest rates, affecting costs.
Understanding the implications of such inflation is crucial for maintaining balance in operations and strategic decision-making.
Firm Profits
Firm profits are significantly affected by both expected and unexpected inflation. When firms experience unexpected inflation, such as when it jumps from an expected 3% to an actual 7%, it can initially be advantageous for their profits. Here's why:

- As the inflation rate rises, firms may adjust their prices to match the 7% inflation, leading to higher revenues. - If their fixed costs, such as wages or long-term agreements, only reflect the expected 3% inflation, their costs do not increase as rapidly. The spread between increasing revenues and slower-growing costs can lead to higher-than-expected profits.

However, over time, the continued inflationary pressures might increase all costs, potentially eroding these profit benefits. Firms must stay agile, continuously adjusting to manage both current and future inflationary impacts. Planning for such economic shifts is key to sustaining and maximizing firm profitability.
Economic Analysis
Economic analysis involves assessing various factors that impact the economy, such as inflation, interest rates, and employment levels. In understanding inflation's impact on firms, analysts evaluate whether inflation is anticipated or unexpected and the resultant effects on profits and costs.

Higher than expected inflation can lead to complex economic scenarios. When inflation exceeds expectations, it can generate a temporary uptick in firm profits due to the dissonance between rising product prices and slowly increasing costs. However, if such trends continue unchecked, they may lead to:
  • Increased cost of living, affecting consumer demand.
  • Rises in interest rates to control inflation, increasing borrowing costs.
  • The potential for inflationary spirals if price increases become entrenched.
Effective economic analysis helps policymakers and businesses anticipate these scenarios. This foresight aids in making informed decisions, ensuring businesses can appropriately respond to both immediate and long-term inflationary challenges, safeguarding economic stability.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Between 1990 and \(2009,\) the U.S. price level rose by about 64 percent while real output increased by about 62 percent. Use the aggregate demand-aggregate supply model to illustrate these outcomes graphically. LO38.2

Suppose that firms are expecting 6 percent inflation while workers are expecting 9 percent inflation. How much of a pay raise will workers demand if their goal is to maintain the purchasing power of their incomes? \(L O 38.4\) a. 3 percent. b. 6 percent. c. 9 percent. d. 12 percent.

Identify the two descriptions below as being the result of either cost-push inflation or demand-pull inflation. \(L O 38.2\) a. Real GDP is below the full-employment level and prices have risen recently. b. Real GDP is above the full-employment level and prices have risen recently.

Suppose that AD and AS intersect at an output level that is higher than the full-employment output level. After the economy adjusts back to equilibrium in the long run, the price level will be LO38.2 a. Higher than it is now. b. Lower than it is now. c. The same as it is now.

Use graphical analysis to show how each of the following would affect the economy first in the short run and then in the long run. Assume that the United States is initially operating at its full-employment level of output, that prices and wages are eventually flexible both upward and downward, and that there is no counteracting fiscal or monetary policy. \(L O 38.2\) a. Because of a war abroad, the oil supply to the United States is disrupted, sending oil prices rocketing upward. b. Construction spending on new homes rises dramatically, greatly increasing total U.S. investment spending. c. Economic recession occurs abroad, significantly reducing foreign purchases of U.S. exports.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free