Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Suppose that the United States has a Gini ratio of 0.41 while Sweden has a Gini ratio of 0.31. Which country has a more equal distribution of income? a. The United States. b. Sweden. c. They are actually equal.

Short Answer

Expert verified
b. Sweden.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Gini Ratio

The Gini ratio, or Gini coefficient, is a measure of statistical dispersion representing income or wealth distribution within a nation. It ranges between 0 and 1, where 0 signifies maximum equality (everyone has the same income) and 1 represents maximum inequality (one person has all the income).
02

Compare the Gini Ratios

We have two Gini ratios to compare: the United States with a Gini ratio of 0.41 and Sweden with a Gini ratio of 0.31. Typically, a lower Gini ratio indicates a more equal distribution of income.
03

Determine the More Equal Distribution

Since Sweden has a Gini ratio of 0.31, which is lower than the United States' Gini ratio of 0.41, it indicates that Sweden has a more equal distribution of income compared to the United States.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Gini Coefficient
The Gini Coefficient is a crucial concept in understanding how income is distributed within a country. This measurement allows us to gauge economic inequality by evaluating income dispersion. The scale ranges from 0 to 1:
  • 0: Represents complete equality, meaning every individual has the same income.
  • 1: Indicates extreme inequality, where one individual possesses all the income, and others have none.
To put it simply, a lower Gini coefficient signifies a more equal income distribution. In our exercise, comparing the Gini ratios of the United States and Sweden (0.41 and 0.31, respectively) helps us quickly understand which country boasts a better income distribution, with Sweden being more equitable in this case.
It's important to note, however, that Gini Coefficient does not cover all nuances of wealth inequality, like differences in wealth accumulation over time or varying social services.
Economic Equality
When we discuss Economic Equality, we are talking about the fair distribution of wealth, resources, and opportunities in a society. It’s a broad concept that examines how closely income and wealth are shared across different groups within a nation.
Economic equality is measured to assess the balance in opportunities for individuals to prosper regardless of their starting point in life. This includes evaluating variables like access to education, healthcare, and financial services.
  • Income Equality: Aims for people having similar incomes and economic opportunities.
  • Opportunity Equality: Focuses on the fairness of chances provided to individuals, which affects their ability to earn.
Achieving economic equality involves addressing systemic factors like poverty and social mobility barriers. Countries with lower Gini ratios often have policies targeting these issues more effectively. Sweden, for instance, tends to offer robust social services and welfare programs to ensure a more equitable society.
Wealth Distribution
Wealth Distribution involves understanding how assets, property, and financial resources are spread across individuals in a society. It goes beyond income distribution to include savings, investments, and ownership, contributing significantly to a person’s economic power.
In many cases, wealth inequality is more pronounced than income disparity because wealth tends to accumulate over generations, often leading to large gaps in financial security and access to opportunities.
  • Asset Accumulation: Wealth includes everything from real estate to stocks and businesses.
  • Intergenerational Wealth: Wealth distribution is influenced by inheritance, creating disparities in wealth distribution across different generations.
Understanding wealth distribution helps us address deeper socio-economic challenges and create more targeted policies. It requires comprehensive strategies that balance income distribution with asset accumulation to achieve long-term economic fairness. Countries like Sweden show that lower Gini ratios go hand-in-hand with efforts to manage both income and wealth disparities effectively.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In the taste-for-discrimination model, an increase in employer prejudice against African-American workers would cause the discrimination coefficient to________ and demand curve for African-American labor to shift________. a. Decrease; right. b. Decrease; left. c. Increase; right. d. Increase; left.

Some part of income inequality is likely to be the result of discrimination. But other factors responsible for inequality include (select as many as apply): c. Different preferences for work versus leisure. d. Different preferences for low-paying but safe jobs relative to high-paying but dangerous jobs. a. Differences in abilities and talents. b. Differences in education and training.

Suppose that a society contains only two members, a lawyer named Monique and a handyman named James. Five years ago, Monique made \(\$ 100,000\) while James made \$50,000. This year, Monique will make \(\$ 300,000\) while James will make \(\$ 100,000\). Which of the following statements about this society's income distribution are true? Select one or more answers from the choices shown. a. In absolute dollar amounts, the entire distribution of income has been moving upward. b. In absolute dollar amounts, the entire distribution of income has been stagnant. c. The relative distribution of income has become more equal. d. The relative distribution of income has become less equal. e. The relative distribution of income has remained constant. T. The rich are getting richer while the poor are getting poorer. g. The rich are getting richer faster than the poor are getting richer.

Suppose that the last dollar that Victoria receives as income brings her a marginal utility of 10 utils while the last dollar that Fredrick receives as income brings him a marginal utility of 15 utils. If our goal is to maximize the combined total utility of Victoria and Fredrick, we should: a. Redistribute income from Victoria to Fredrick. b. Redistribute income from Fredrick to Victoria. c. Not engage in any redistribution because the current situation already maximizes total utility. d. None of the above.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free