Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In Country \(\mathrm{A}\), the production of 1 bicycle requires using resources that could otherwise be used to produce 11 lamps. In Country \(B\), the production of 1 bicycle requires using resources that could otherwise be used to produce 15 lamps. Which country has a comparative advantage in making bicycles? \(L O 38.2.\) a. Country A. b. Country B.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Country A has a comparative advantage in making bicycles.

Step by step solution

01

Define Comparative Advantage

Comparative advantage refers to a country's ability to produce a good at a lower opportunity cost than another country. We will determine which country gives up fewer lamps to make one bicycle.
02

Calculate Opportunity Costs

In Country A, the opportunity cost of producing 1 bicycle is 11 lamps (as those resources could instead produce 11 lamps). In Country B, the opportunity cost is 15 lamps (the resources could instead produce 15 lamps).
03

Determine Lower Opportunity Cost

Comparing the opportunity costs, Country A gives up 11 lamps to produce 1 bicycle, while Country B gives up 15 lamps. Therefore, Country A has a lower opportunity cost for producing bicycles.
04

Conclude Comparative Advantage

The country with the lower opportunity cost has the comparative advantage. Since Country A sacrifices fewer lamps, it has the comparative advantage in producing bicycles.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Opportunity Cost and Its Significance
Opportunity cost is a crucial economic concept that refers to the value of the next best alternative foregone when a choice is made. In simpler terms, if you choose to do one thing, opportunity cost is what you give up by not doing something else. In the context of the exercise, when Country A or B decides to produce a bicycle, it is giving up producing a certain number of lamps. This number of lamps represents the opportunity cost of producing a bicycle.

Understanding opportunity cost helps in deciding which goods to produce by showing us what will be sacrificed. It ultimately influences economic choices not only on an individual level but also for entire countries and businesses. By determining which resource allocation yields the least opportunity cost, countries can maximize their efficiency and output.
International Trade and Comparative Advantage
International trade is the exchange of goods and services between countries. By trading, countries can specialize in producing goods in which they have a comparative advantage, meaning they can produce them at a lower opportunity cost compared to others.

In the case of Country A and Country B, Country A can produce bicycles more efficiently as it foregoes fewer lamps than Country B for each bicycle made. Through international trade, Country A could decide to specialize in bicycles, while Country B focuses on lamps. This trade can lead to benefits for both, allowing them access to a greater variety of goods than if they attempted to produce everything domestically.

Thus, trade leverages comparative advantage, leading to higher levels of prosperity and efficiency globally.
Bicycle Production and Specialization
Bicycle production, like any manufacturing process, demands careful allocation of resources. It is about finding an efficient balance between various alternatives. In our exercise, Country A and B are weighing between making bicycles or lamps.

Specialization is key in optimizing production and can be based on where each producer has a comparative advantage. Here, Country A shows a natural inclination towards bicycle production because it uses resources that otherwise could produce only 11 lamps, compared to 15 in Country B. This indicates a more efficient use of its resources for bicycles.

By specializing in what they are relatively best at (bicycles for Country A), and potentially trading with Country B, which could specialize in a more lamp-centric production, the overall efficiency is increased.
Resolving Economic Problems Using Comparative Advantage
Economic problem-solving often involves making decisions on allocation and trade to maximize societal welfare. Using the principle of comparative advantage, countries can resolve such problems by choosing to produce goods where they have a lower opportunity cost relative to others.

In our example, through analyzing opportunity costs, we determine the best allocation of resources for Country A and B. The concept aids in identifying where each should focus its production efforts. By doing so, it solves the economic problem of resource scarcity and potential wastage, leading to improved economic outcomes.

Therefore, relying on comparative advantage allows nations to address economic problems in a structured manner by identifying areas of strength and strategically planning resource distribution. This creates a more prosperous and balanced global economy.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

American apparel makers complain to Congress about competition from China. Congress decides to impose either a tariff or a quota on apparel imports from China. Which policy would Chinese apparel manufacturers prefer? \(L O 38.4\) a. Tariff. b. Quota.

True or False: If a country is open to international trade, the domestic price can differ from the international price. LO38.3

Suppose that the current international price of wheat is S6 per bushel and that the United States is currently exporting 30 million bushels per year. If the United States suddenly became a closed economy with respect to wheat, would the domestic price of wheat in the United States end up higher or lower than \(\$ 6 ?\) LO38.3 a. Higher. b. Lower. c. The same.

Draw a domestic supply-and-demand diagram for a product in which the United States does not have a comparative advantage. What impact do foreign imports have on domestic price and quantity? On your diagram show a protective tariff that eliminates approximately one-half of the assumed imports. What are the price-quantity effects of this tariff on \((a)\) domestic consumers, \((b)\) domestic producers, and \((c)\) foreign exporters? How would the effects of a quota that creates the same amount of imports differ? LO38.4

Suppose that if Iceland and Japan were both closed economies, the domestic price of fish would be \(\$ 100\) per ton in Iceland and \(\$ 90\) per ton in Japan. If the two countries decided to open up to international trade with each other, which of the following could be the equilibrium international price of fish once they begin trading? LO38.3 a. \(\$ 75\) b. \(\$ 85\) c. S95. d. \(\$ 105\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free