Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In January, the interest rate is 5 percent and firms borrow 50 billion dollars per month for investment projects. In February, the federal government doubles its monthly borrowing from 25 billion dollars to 50 billion dollars . That drives the interest rate up to 7 percent. As a result, firms cut back their borrowing to only 30 billion dollars per month. Which of the following is true? a. There is no crowding-out effect because the government's increase in borrowing exceeds firms decrease in borrowing. b. There is a crowding-out effect of 20 billion dollars . c. There is no crowding-out effect because both the government and firms are still borrowing a lot. d. There is a crowding-out effect of 25 billion dollars .

Short Answer

Expert verified
There is a crowding-out effect of 20 billion dollars.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Initial Scenario

Initially, firms are borrowing 50 billion dollars at an interest rate of 5%. The government is borrowing 25 billion dollars at this time. This sets the total borrowing demand in the financial market.
02

Analyzing the Change in Government Borrowing

In February, the government doubles its borrowing from 25 billion to 50 billion dollars. This is an increase of 25 billion dollars, which can potentially affect the interest rates and the borrowing behavior of other entities in the market.
03

Calculating the Change in Interest Rate and Firm Borrowing

The increase in government borrowing raises the interest rate from 5% to 7%. This rise in interest rate causes firms to reduce their borrowing from 50 billion to 30 billion dollars, which is a decrease of 20 billion dollars.
04

Determining the Crowding-Out Effect

The crowding-out effect occurs when increased government borrowing leads to higher interest rates, which subsequently reduces private sector borrowing. Here, the increase in government borrowing made firms cut their borrowing by 20 billion dollars.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Interest Rates
Interest rates are a vital part of economic activity and influence how much borrowing takes place in the financial markets. Essentially, an interest rate is the cost of borrowing money. When interest rates are low, borrowing money is cheaper, encouraging businesses and individuals to take out loans for various purposes. In the case of businesses, low interest rates can lead to an increase in investments as companies might find it more profitable to pursue new projects.

However, when interest rates rise, the cost of borrowing becomes more expensive. This often leads to a reduction in borrowing activities. Banks and lenders adjust their rates based on multiple factors, including government policy and the overall demand for credit. In our scenario, the interest rate jumped from 5% to 7%, making it more costly for firms to borrow money. This increase in interest rate ultimately contributed to firms cutting back their borrowing to avoid higher costs.
Government Borrowing
Government borrowing occurs when a government chooses to raise money to finance its spending. This is typically achieved through the issuance of government bonds, bills, and other debt instruments. In our situation, the federal government decided to double its borrowing from 25 billion dollars to 50 billion dollars.

This substantial increase in government borrowing placed more demand on the financial market. When a government borrows heavily, it can crowd out private borrowers, as seen in the exercise. The additional demand for funds by the government escalated interest rates. Consequently, private entities, like firms, may find themselves unable to borrow as much as they could before, because loans become more expensive.
Private Sector Borrowing
Private sector borrowing refers to the funds sourced by companies or individuals for investment or personal use. Firms, for instance, borrow money to finance their investment projects, expand their operations, or improve their infrastructure. The private sector is very sensitive to changes in interest rates.

In the given exercise, firms were initially borrowing 50 billion dollars at an interest rate of 5%. However, as the government borrowing surged and interest rates rose to 7%, firms had to reduce their borrowing to 30 billion dollars. This reduction showcases the crowding-out effect, where the rising interest rates affected due to increased government borrowing led to a decrease in private sector borrowing.
Investment Projects
Investment projects often drive economic growth by enabling companies to improve and expand their business operations. These projects can include buying new equipment, expanding existing facilities, or venturing into new markets. The ability to obtain financing at a reasonable cost is a key component for firms planning these investments.

In our scenario, investment projects were initially being financed when firms borrowed 50 billion dollars monthly. But with the government increasing its borrowing and causing a spike in interest rates, the cost of financing these projects rose significantly. As a result, firms reduced their borrowing by 20 billion dollars, likely postponing or scaling back on some of their investment plans. This hindrance in investment activity exemplifies how increased competition for funds can limit private sector expansion and delay economic growth efforts.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Last year, while an economy was in a recession, government spending was 595 billion dollars and government revenue was S505 billion. Economists estimate that if the economy had been at its full-employment level of GDP last year, government spending would have been 555 billion dollars and government revenue would have been 550 billion dollars . Which of the following statements about this government's fiscal situation are true? a. The government has a non-cyclically adjusted budget deficit of 595 billion dollars . b. The government has a non-cyclically adjusted budget deficit of 90 billion dollars . c. The government has a non-cyclically adjusted budget surplus of S90 billion dollars . d. The government has a cyclically adjusted budget deficit of 555 billion dollars . e. The government has a cyclically adjusted budget deficit of 5 billion dollars . f. The government has a cyclically adjusted budget surplus of 5 billion dollars .

The economy is in a recession. A congresswoman suggests increasing spending to stimulate aggregate demand but also at the same time raising taxes to pay for the increased spending. Her suggestion to combine higher government expenditures with higher taxes is: \(L O 31.1\) a. The worst possible combination of tax and expenditure changes. b. The best possible combination of tax and expenditure changes. c. A mediocre and contradictory combination of tax and expenditure changes. d. None of the above.

Which of the following would help a government reduce an inflationary output gap? \(L O 31.1\) a. Raising taxes. b. Lowering taxes. c. Increasing government spending. d. Decreasing government spending.

During the recession of \(2007-2009,\) the U.S. federal government's tax collections fell from about 2.6 trillion dollars down to about 2.1 trillion dollars while GDP declined by about 4 percent. Does the U.S. tax system appear to have builtin stabilizers? LO31.2 a. Yes. b. No.

Label each of the following scenarios in which there are problems enacting and applying fiscal policy as being an example of either recognition lag, administrative lag, or operational lag. a. To fight a recession, Congress has passed a bill to increase infrastructure spending-but the legally required environmental-impact statement for each new project will take at least two years to complete before any building can begin. b. Distracted by a war that is going badly, inflation reaches 8 percent before politicians take notice. c. A sudden recession is recognized by politicians, but it takes many months of political deal making before a stimulus bill is finally approved. d. To fight a recession, the president orders federal agencies to get rid of petty regulations that burden private businesses-but the federal agencies begin by spending a year developing a set of regulations on how to remove petty regulations.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free