Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Suppose that the last dollar that Victoria receives as income brings her a marginal utility of 10 utils while the last dollar that Fredrick receives as income brings him a marginal utility of 15 utils. If our goal is to maximize the combined total utility of Victoria and Fredrick, we should: a. Redistribute income from Victoria to Fredrick. b. Redistribute income from Fredrick to Victoria. c. Not engage in any redistribution because the current situation already maximizes total utility. d. None of the above.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Redistribute income from Victoria to Fredrick (option a).

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Marginal Utility

Marginal utility is the additional satisfaction or utility gained from consuming an additional unit of a good or service. In this problem, we examine the marginal utility derived from the last dollar received by Victoria and Fredrick. Victoria receives 10 utils from her last dollar, while Fredrick receives 15 utils from his last dollar.
02

Analyzing Combined Total Utility

To maximize the total utility, we aim to equalize the marginal utility per dollar for both individuals. Currently, Fredrick gains more utility (15 utils) from an extra dollar than Victoria (10 utils). This indicates redistribution could improve total utility.
03

Deciding on Redistribution

Since Fredrick gains more utility from an extra dollar than Victoria, we should redistribute income from Victoria to Fredrick. This would increase the total utility because each dollar moved to Fredrick is valued more by him.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Income Redistribution
Income redistribution refers to adjusting the distribution of income across various individuals or groups to achieve a certain goal, such as maximizing total utility. When considering the marginal utility of money, it helps to identify who benefits more from each additional dollar. In Victoria's and Fredrick's case, Fredrick derives more utility from each extra dollar (15 utils) compared to Victoria (10 utils).
This situation suggests that shifting some income from Victoria to Fredrick can increase the overall utility. When resources are limited, redistribution aims to enhance the well-being of those who stand to benefit more, resulting in a more efficient outcome for the group as a whole. This is because Fredrick derives greater satisfaction from each additional dollar beyond what Victoria does.
Practical income redistribution strategies can include:
  • Taxation policies that are progressive, meaning higher earners pay a larger percentage.
  • Government welfare programs targeted towards individuals with lower marginal utilities.
Such strategies ensure that income shifts towards individuals who can maximize the use of each additional dollar, thereby increasing the total welfare.
Combined Total Utility
Combined total utility is the sum of satisfaction or happiness of all individuals in a group from consuming goods or services. The goal is to get the most overall well-being for a group, rather than focusing on just one individual's satisfaction.
In the example of Victoria and Fredrick, the combined total utility is determined by how effectively each individual uses each dollar they receive. Fredrick gains more from each additional dollar, indicating that moving more dollars to him can raise the whole group's utility. The total utility is not simply about adding up individual utilities; it's about optimizing the distribution where each unit of currency creates the most satisfaction.
  • Maximizing combined total utility ensures the group as a whole benefits the most from any distribution of resources.
  • It examines who can derive more value from a smaller amount of resources, ensuring resources are not wasted.
Ultimately, it's about achieving the highest possible group satisfaction through strategic resource allocation.
Utility Maximization
Utility maximization is the process of adjusting the allocation of resources to achieve the highest possible total utility. It involves strategic decisions to ensure that each unit of currency or resource moves to where it is most valued.
In scenarios like Victoria and Fredrick's, utility maximization requires examining who gains more satisfaction per dollar received. By directing money towards Fredrick, who draws higher utility from every additional dollar, we enhance the overall wellness of the group.
This concept can be described further as:
  • Ensuring that marginal utility per dollar is the same across all individuals for optimal distribution.
  • Focusing on moving resources where they create the most satisfaction, rather than equally distributing resources.
In practice, utility maximization means identifying individuals with higher marginal utilities and redistributing resources to them, thereby efficiently achieving the best outcome for everyone involved.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In the taste-for-discrimination model, an increase in employer prejudice against African-American workers would cause the discrimination coefficient to_______________________ and the demand curve for African-American labor to shift__________________________. a. Decrease; right. b. Decrease; left. c. Increase; right. d. Increase; left.

If women are crowded into elementary education and away from fire fighting, wages in fire fighting will tend to be___________________than if women weren't crowded into elementary education. a. Higher. b. Lower.

Some part of income inequality is likely to be the result of discrimination. But other factors responsible for inequality include (select as many as apply): a. Differences in abilities and talents. b. Differences in education and training. c. Different preferences for work versus leisure. d. Different preferences for low-paying but safe jobs relative to high-paying but dangerous jobs.

Suppose that a society contains only two members, a lawyer named Monique and a handyman named James. Five years ago, Monique made \(\$ 100,000\) while James made \(\$ 50,000\). This year, Monique will make \(\$ 300,000\) while James will make \(\$ 100,000 .\) Which of the following statements about this society's income distribution are true? Select one or more answers from the choices shown. a. In absolute dollar amounts, the entire distribution of income has been moving upward. b. In absolute dollar amounts, the entire distribution of income has been stagnant. c. The relative distribution of income has become more equal. d. The relative distribution of income has become less equal. e. The relative distribution of income has remained constant. f. The rich are getting richer while the poor are getting poorer. g. The rich are getting richer faster than the poor are

Suppose that the United States has a Gini ratio of 0.41 while Sweden has a Gini ratio of 0.3 1. Which country has a more equal distribution of income? a. The United States. b. Sweden. c. They are actually equal.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free