Think of third-degree price discrimination as a strategic move akin to a chess game, where an institution, such as a university, makes careful pricing decisions with the specific groups it serves. This strategy is akin to offering one customer a classic chess set at a standard price, while offering a chess enthusiast a limited-edition set at a premium, based on their willingness to pay more for specialized features.
For instance, colleges that engage in third-degree price discrimination assess the market and notice different sensitivities to price, such as the case between residents and nonresidents of a state. This allows them to capture more consumer surplus, a concept akin to gaining a greater territory on the chessboard, expanding the university's financial reach.
- Resident students might have a higher price sensitivity, being more responsive to price changes due to their proximity and potential alternatives.
- Nonresident students might have a lower price sensitivity and a smaller range of alternatives, making them less responsive to price changes, which turns them into a premium market.
By understanding and implementing these distinctions, universities are playing a strategic game where they maximize their potential gains.