Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The following data summarize the trade between Canada and the United States in 2015 and 2016 . In both years, the value of Canada's exports to the United States exceeded the value of U.S. exports to Canada. Can we conclude that foreign trade between the two countries benefited Canada more than it benefited the United States? Briefly explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
No, we cannot conclude that the foreign trade between Canada and the United States benefited Canada more simply because it had a trade surplus. Benefits from foreign trade are not only about value but also about increased efficiency, economic growth, diversification of goods and services, among other factors.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Trade Balance

The value of exports exceeding imports would usually mean a trade surplus for a country. In this case, Canada has a trade surplus as the value of its exports to the United States is greater than the value of its imports.
02

Understanding Trade Benefits

However, having a trade surplus, like Canada, or a trade deficit, like the U.S., does not directly correlate with 'benefit'. Trade allows countries to specialize in producing the goods they are most efficient at, to sell abroad, and use the income to import goods that it is less efficient at producing domestically. Both countries can benefit from this increased efficiency, regardless of whether they run a trade surplus or deficit.
03

Concluding the Analysis

Thus, merely looking at trade bars (in terms of exported and imported values) is not enough to conclude which country benefited more in a trade. Ideally, the country that is more efficient in producing and can compete in the global market is the one that benefits more from foreign trade.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Trade Surplus
A trade surplus occurs when a country exports more goods and services than it imports. This means that the country receives more money from its international trade than it spends. For Canada, having a trade surplus with the United States in 2015 and 2016 indicates that it was selling more to the U.S. than it was buying. This can seem like a positive situation as it suggests a strong demand for Canadian products abroad.
However, a trade surplus isn't always beneficial. While it might boost a country's economy temporarily, relying too heavily on exports can expose the country to economic issues in its trading partners. It's essential to maintain a balanced approach between exports and imports to ensure long-term economic stability.
It's also important to note that a trade surplus can lead to potential trade tensions. Countries that consistently run surpluses might face pressure from their trade partners to import more or face retaliatory trade measures.
Trade Deficit
A trade deficit happens when a country imports more than it exports. This was the case for the United States in its trade with Canada over the years 2015 and 2016. It might sound negative since it indicates more money is going out than coming in, but it isn't necessarily a bad thing.
Running a trade deficit can lead to a broader variety of goods and services available to consumers. It often reflects a country's strong consumer demand and ability to produce high-value goods that may not be export-heavy. Moreover, deficits can be fixed over time as economies adjust to global changes.
Trade deficits can also signal that a country is investing more in the economy's future potential rather than merely focusing on current outputs. Balancing the pros and cons of both surplus and deficit is key to effective economic policy.
Trade Efficiency
The concept of trade efficiency revolves around maximizing economic benefits by allocating resources to produce goods and services a country is best at. By focusing on areas of comparative advantage, countries can increase their overall wealth and productivity.
Trade between Canada and the U.S. illustrates trade efficiency. Both countries enjoy the economic benefits of specializing in their strengths. Canada might focus on areas like natural resources, while the U.S. could specialize in technology sectors. By trading these goods, both countries use their resources most efficiently, leading to increased economic gains.
Efficiency in trade means reducing costs and maximizing profits from international trade relations. It's not just about who has a surplus or deficit; it's about how efficiently resources are utilized across borders to benefit both countries.
Economic Benefits of Trade
International trade offers several economic benefits that are essential for growth and prosperity. For one, it allows countries to access a broader range of goods and services, often at lower costs. This increases consumer choice and quality of life.
  • Trade drives innovation and competition, encouraging countries and businesses to innovate and improve efficiency.
  • It leads to job creation in sectors where a country has a competitive advantage.
  • Export revenues can stimulate economic growth and development.
For Canada and the U.S., their trade relationship results in shared economic benefits despite imbalances in trade figures. Both countries gain from specialized industries and resource optimization, making it a win-win scenario in many ways.
In summary, while the trade balance might suggest one country benefits more, the actual economic benefits are deeper, with both enjoying increased efficiency, innovation, and quality of life improvements.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In 2017 , shortly after President Trump took office, the U.S. Department of Commerce considered imposing tariffs on European steel companies it accused of dumping steel on the U.S. market. An article in the Wall Street Journal quoted Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross as asserting, "A healthy steel industry is critical to our economy and manufacturing base, yet our steel industry today is under assault from foreign producers that dump and subsidize their exports." What is dumping? If the United States imposes tariffs on imports of steel from Europe, briefly explain who is likely to gain and who is likely to lose.

Hal Varian, chief economist at Google, made the following two observations about international trade: 1\. Trade allows a country "to produce more with less." 2\. "There is little doubt who wins [from trade] in the long run: consumers." Briefly explain whether you agree with either or both of these observations.

What is the difference between absolute advantage and comparative advantage? If a country has an absolute advantage in producing a good, will it always be an exporter of that good? Briefly explain.

What is the difference between absolute advantage and comparative advantage? If a country has an absolute advantage in producing a good, will it always be an exporter of that good? Briefly explain.

An article in the Wall Street Journal discussing the effect of Chinese imports on the U.S. economy made the following observation: "[China's] emergence as a trade powerhouse rattled the American economy more violently than economists and policy makers anticipated at the time.... The U.S. workforce adapted more slowly than expected." a. What does the article mean that China's emergence as a trade powerhouse rattled the U.S. economy? b. Why didn't economists and policymakers expect the economic effect of imports from China to be as great as it turned out to be? c. In what sense has the U.S. workforce adapted more slowly than expected?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free