Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Briefly explain whether you agree with the following argument: "Unfortunately, Bolivia does not have a comparative advantage with respect to the United States in the production of any good or service." (Hint: You do not need any specific information about the economies of Bolivia or the United States to be able to answer this question.)

Short Answer

Expert verified
No, the statement lacks context. According to the principle of comparative advantage, it is likely that Bolivia has a comparative advantage in something, even if the United States is overall more productive. Comparative advantage means that Bolivia can produce a good or service at a lower opportunity cost compared to the United States, not that it can produce more efficiently overall.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Comparative Advantage

Comparative Advantage is an economic law referring to the ability of any given economic actor to produce goods and services at a lower opportunity cost than other economic actors. The economic actor can be an individual, firm, or country. The principle of comparative advantage explains that, even if one entity can produce all goods with fewer resources than another entity, trade can still be beneficial for both if they specialize in producing and trading goods that they can produce at the lowest cost.
02

Apply the concept of Comparative Advantage to Bolivia and United States

Even if the United States has an absolute advantage in producing all goods and services due to its advanced technology and resources, it does not mean that Bolivia does not have a comparative advantage. Bolivia may have a lower opportunity cost in producing certain goods or services compared to the United States. This is because even if the U.S. is more efficient at producing all goods, it makes sense to allocate their resources to produce goods that it is most efficient at, and import goods that other countries can produce at a lower opportunity cost.
03

Conclusion

Therefore, without specific information, it's inappropriate to argue that Bolivia does not have a comparative advantage in the production of any good or service with respect to the United States. In economics, it's fair to suppose that every country has a comparative advantage in some kind of good or service.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Opportunity Cost
When we dive into the concept of opportunity cost, what we're looking at is the value of the next best alternative that an individual, firm, or country forgoes as a result of choosing one option over another. It represents the benefits that could have been gained had the resources been allocated differently. In the realm of economics, understanding opportunity cost is crucial as it helps clarify why trade-offs are necessary and why certain choices are made over others.

For example, if a country like Bolivia uses its resources to produce cotton instead of soybeans, the opportunity cost is the profit it could have earned from cultivating soybeans. This concept ties closely with comparative advantage, as an economic actor will thrive by specializing in producing goods or services for which it has the lowest opportunity cost. Therefore, it is essential for countries to assess their opportunity costs to determine their areas of comparative advantage.
Economic Actors

In economic terms, economic actors encompass individuals, households, firms, and countries that engage in the production, consumption, and exchange of goods and services. Each actor has its own set of objectives and constraints, shaping the decisions they make and the roles they play within the economy.

Economic actors are central to the concept of comparative advantage. When a country like Bolivia or the United States engages in trade, these actors evaluate their production capabilities and opportunity costs to decide which goods or services they should produce and which ones are better to acquire through trade. Diverse economic landscapes and resource endowments mean that each actor is unique in their comparative advantage, which promotes the idea of specialization and trade to maximize economic efficiency and welfare.

Trade Specialization
The concept of trade specialization is a key outcome of the theory of comparative advantage. It refers to the economic strategy where each country or economic actor focuses on producing and exporting goods and services in which they have the lowest opportunity costs and, conversely, importing those where their opportunity cost is relatively high.

This specialization allows for increases in efficiency and production levels, benefiting from economies of scale and the refinement of expertise and technologies dedicated to those specific goods or services. For instance, even if Bolivia might not have an absolute advantage over the United States in any category, specializing in goods where it has a comparative advantage allows trade that is mutually beneficial. By doing so, Bolivia might focus on products linked to their natural resources, such as minerals, while the US might export high-tech machinery, aligning with each country's unique capabilities and contributing to global economic prosperity.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The United States produces beef and also imports beef from other countries. a. Draw a graph showing the demand and supply of beef in the United States. Assume that the United States can import as much as it wants at the world price of beef without causing the world price of beef to increase. Be sure to indicate on your graph the quantity of beef imported. Assume that the world price of beef is lower than the U.S. price. b. Now show on your graph the effect of the United States imposing a tariff on beef. Be sure to indicate on your graph the quantity of beef sold by U.S. producers before and after the tariff is imposed, the quantity of beef imported before and after the tariff, and the price of beef in the United States before and after the tariff. c. Discuss who benefits and who loses when the United States imposes a tariff on beef.

(Related to the Apply the Concept on page 312 ) According to an opinion column in the New York Times, because of attempts to make it more difficult to import catfish into the United States, many Vietnamese businesses that export catfish shifted from exporting to the United States to exporting to China. Briefly explain who gained and who lost as a result of this adjustment by Vietnamese businesses resulting from U.S. trade restrictions.

Hal Varian, chief economist at Google, made the following two observations about international trade: 1\. Trade allows a country "to produce more with less." 2\. "There is little doubt who wins [from trade] in the long run: consumers." Briefly explain whether you agree with either or both of these observations.

Briefly explain whether you agree with the following statement: "International trade is more important to the U.S. economy than it is to most other economies."

Political commentator B. Bruce-Briggs once wrote the following in the Wall Street Journal: "This is not to say that the case for international free trade is invalid; it is just irrelevant. It is an 'if only everybody' ... argument .... In the real world almost everybody sees benefits in economic nationalism." What do you think he means by "economic nationalism"? Do you agree that a country benefits from free trade only if every other country also practices free trade? Briefly explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free