Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

What is the difference between absolute advantage and comparative advantage? If a country has an absolute advantage in producing a good, will it always be an exporter of that good? Briefly explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The difference between absolute and comparative advantage lies in efficiency and opportunity cost. Absolute advantage refers to the ability to produce more of a good or service with the same amount of resources, whereas comparative advantage relates to the ability to produce a good or service at a lower opportunity cost. A country with an absolute advantage might not always be an exporter of that good because it would only export goods in which it has a comparative advantage due to lower opportunity cost.

Step by step solution

01

Definition of Absolute Advantage

Absolute advantage is when a country can produce a good or service more efficiently (i.e. using fewer resources) than another country. That is, the country produces more output per unit of input compared to other countries.
02

Definition of Comparative Advantage

Comparative advantage, on the other hand, is when a country can produce a good or service at a lower opportunity cost than other countries. It can be beneficial for a country to specialize in producing the goods and services where it has a comparative advantage and trading for others.
03

Relationship between Absolute Advantage and Comparative Advantage with Exports

Having an absolute advantage in producing a good does not necessarily mean a country will be the exporter of that good. A country will export goods where they have a comparative advantage due to the lower opportunity cost. For instance, it is possible for a country to have an absolute advantage in producing both goods A and B, but only have a comparative advantage in producing good A. In this case, the country should specialize in producing good A and import good B, even if it has an absolute advantage in producing both.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Absolute Advantage
Absolute advantage occurs when a country can produce a good or service more efficiently than another country. This means using fewer resources, such as labor, land, or capital, to produce the same amount of goods. For example, if Country X can produce 10 tons of rice using the same resources that Country Y uses to produce 5 tons, Country X has an absolute advantage in rice production.

However, having an absolute advantage does not automatically make a country the best at everything. It's important to remember that what matters most in international trade is not just absolute efficiency but also opportunity costs and comparative advantages.
  • Absolute advantage emphasizes efficiency and resource use.
  • It compares output per unit of input among different countries.
  • It does not necessarily determine international trade patterns on its own.
Opportunity Cost
Opportunity cost is a key concept in economics, especially when discussing comparative advantage. It refers to the cost of forgoing the next best alternative when making a decision. In simpler terms, it's what you give up to get something else.

When applying opportunity cost to production, consider a country that produces both cars and textiles. If it chooses to produce more cars, the opportunity cost is the textiles it could have produced with those same resources. Understanding and calculating these costs helps nations determine where their comparative advantages lie.
  • Opportunity cost is about trade-offs and choices.
  • It helps in calculating comparative advantages.
  • Lower opportunity costs often guide production and trade decisions.
International Trade
International trade is the exchange of goods and services between countries. This exchange is driven primarily by comparative advantage, not necessarily absolute advantage.

Even if a country holds an absolute advantage, it will typically export goods or services where it has a comparative advantage. This ensures that countries focus on what they can produce most cost-effectively, while importing other goods or services. This trade strategy enhances global efficiency and benefits all trading partners.
  • Trade is based on the principle of comparative advantage.
  • Countries export goods where they have lower opportunity costs.
  • International trade leads to mutual gains for trading nations.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A columnist for bloomberg.com offered the following observation about economic legislation: "History shows that concentrated opposition beats diffuse support every time." a. Briefly explain what this columnist means. b. Does his observation apply to tariffs? Briefly explain.

Briefly explain whether you agree with the following statement: "Japan has always been much more heavily involved in international trade than are most other nations. In fact, today Japan exports a larger fraction of its GDP than Germany, the United Kingdom, or the United States."

An article in the New Yorker stated, "The main burden of trade-related job losses and wage declines has fallen on middle- and lower-income Americans. But ... the very people who suffer most from free trade are often, paradoxically, among its biggest beneficiaries." Explain how it is possible that middle-and lower-income Americans are both the biggest losers and at the same time the biggest winners from free trade.

Suppose you are explaining the benefits of free trade and someone states, "I don't understand all the principles of comparative advantage and gains from trade. I just know that if I buy something produced in America, I create a job for an American, and if I buy something produced in Brazil, I create a job for a Brazilian." Do you agree with this statement? When the United States imports products for which it does not have a comparative advantage, does this mean there are fewer jobs in the United States? In the example in Section 9.3 with China and the United States producing and trading smartphones and wheat, when the United States imports smartphones from China, does the number of jobs in the United States decline? Briefly explain.

At one time, Eastman Kodak was the world's largest producer of photographic film, employing nearly 145,000 workers worldwide, including thousands at its headquarters in Rochester, New York. The firm eventually laid off most of those workers because its sales declined as it failed to adjust to digital photography as quickly as many of its foreign competitors. A member of Congress from Rochester described the many new firms that were now located in buildings that were formerly owned by Kodak. A New York Times columnist concluded, "which, of course, is precisely the way globalization is supposed to work." Briefly explain what the columnist meant. Do you agree with his conclusion?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free