Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Former President Barack Obama once described a trade agreement reached with the government of Colombia as a "win-win' for both our countries." Is everyone in both countries likely to win from the agreement? Briefly explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
No, not everyone in both countries is likely to win from a trade agreement. While it might engender benefits such as economic stimulus and consumer advantages such as variety and reduced prices, it can also pose certain drawbacks. Industries facing increased competition from imports might witness job losses, and it could result in increased economic inequality, meaning the benefits and impacts are not uniformly distributed.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Trade Agreements

Begin by recognizing that trade agreements are typically entered into by countries to foster economic relations, promote trade, or reduce trade barriers such as tariffs or quotas. This may stimulate theconomy and create jobs, which may seem beneficial for everyone. However, it’s also crucial to understand that the benefits may not be evenly distributed.
02

Analyzing Potential Winners

In a trade agreement, potential winners may include consumers who gain access to a greater variety of goods and services at lower prices, exporters who gain access to new markets, and industries that see increased demand due to reduced barriers. So, in this context, it can be considered a 'win' for those groups of people in both countries.
03

Considering Potential Losers

Conversely, there may also be losers in a trade agreement. These may include industries that now face increased competition from imports, resulting in potential job losses. Also, there can be increase in economic inequality with greater profits garnered by exporters, and sectors facing foreign competition might endure hardships. Therefore, it may not be a 'win' for those groups.
04

Conclusion

In conclusion, while a trade agreement might be beneficial overall for the economy of both countries, it does not guarantee that all individuals, sectors, or groups within those countries will benefit equally. Some might win more while others might even lose, which means it’s not necessarily a 'win-win' for everyone in both countries.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Understanding Tariffs
Tariffs are taxes imposed on imported goods. They are designed to make imported items more expensive than domestic goods, encouraging people to buy locally made products. While they help local industries by reducing foreign competition, they can also lead to higher prices for consumers. When tariffs are reduced or removed in trade agreements, imported goods become cheaper, leading to increased variety and reduced prices for consumers.
This can boost the economy by allowing people to buy more and enjoy access to newer goods. However, the challenge lies in balancing the protection of domestic jobs with the need for affordable goods from abroad. In international trade agreements, tariffs are often a sticking point as they directly impact the economy of each nation involved.
Exploring Economic Inequality
Economic inequality refers to the uneven distribution of wealth within a population. In the context of trade agreements, this inequality can become more pronounced. While exporters and consumers often benefit, not everyone shares equally in these benefits.
For instance, wealthier individuals who own exporting businesses might see significant profits. However, workers in local industries facing tough export competition might lose their jobs, widening the economic gap between the rich and the poor. Hence, while a trade agreement might promise overall growth, the distribution of this growth can be unequal, benefitting some more than others.
Import Competition Dynamics
Import competition arises when foreign goods enter a domestic market, competing with local products. This can be beneficial, as it forces local industries to improve quality and efficiency. However, it can also be challenging for domestic companies that aren't able to compete on price or quality.
Trade agreements often bring about increased import competition, leading to several possible outcomes. Local companies that can't compete may experience reduced profits, operational downsizing, or even closure, resulting in job losses. On the other hand, successful integration can lead to improved product offerings and more competitive pricing for consumers.
Benefits for Consumers
Consumers are usually one of the primary beneficiaries of international trade agreements. When tariffs are lowered, prices on imported goods decrease, allowing people to purchase more and save money. Additionally, trade agreements increase the variety of goods available, giving consumers greater choice.
Beyond cost savings and variety, consumers may also benefit from higher quality goods resulting from increased competition among producers. However, the overall impact on consumer welfare can vary. While products become more affordable, the economic dislocation in some sectors can also affect consumers indirectly through changes in local employment and economic stability.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Briefly explain whether you agree with the following argument: "Unfortunately, Bolivia does not have a comparative advantage with respect to the United States in the production of any good or service." (Hint: You do not need any specific information about the economies of Bolivia or the United States to be able to answer this question.)

Hal Varian, chief economist at Google, made the following two observations about international trade: 1\. Trade allows a country "to produce more with less." 2\. "There is little doubt who wins [from trade] in the long run: consumers." Briefly explain whether you agree with either or both of these observations.

A student makes the following argument: Tariffs on imports of foreign goods into the United States will cause the foreign companies to add the amount of the tariff to the prices they charge in the United States for those goods. Instead of putting a tariff on imported goods, we should ban importing them. Banning imported goods is better than putting tariffs on them because U.S. producers benefit from the reduced competition, and U.S. consumers don't have to pay the higher prices caused by tariffs. Briefly explain whether you agree with the student's reasoning.

A book on the Roman Empire made the following observation: "Romans bought their pots from professional potters, and bought their defence from professional soldiers. From both they got a quality product-much better than if they had had to do their soldiering and potting themselves." Briefly explain what economic concept the author is illustrating in this passage. How does he know that Romans got better pots and better defense by relying on this economic concept?

The United States produces beef and also imports beef from other countries. a. Draw a graph showing the demand and supply of beef in the United States. Assume that the United States can import as much as it wants at the world price of beef without causing the world price of beef to increase. Be sure to indicate on your graph the quantity of beef imported. Assume that the world price of beef is lower than the U.S. price. b. Now show on your graph the effect of the United States imposing a tariff on beef. Be sure to indicate on your graph the quantity of beef sold by U.S. producers before and after the tariff is imposed, the quantity of beef imported before and after the tariff, and the price of beef in the United States before and after the tariff. c. Discuss who benefits and who loses when the United States imposes a tariff on beef.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free