Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

(Related to the Apply the Concept on page 256) Two economists at the Brookings Institution argued that "new firms rather than existing ones have accounted for a disproportionate share of disruptive and thus highly productivity enhancing innovations in the past- the automobile, the airplane, the computer and personal computer, air conditioning, and Internet search, to name just a few." a. Why might new firms be more likely than older firms to introduce "disruptive" innovations? b. Assuming that these economists are correct about the most important source of productivity enhancing innovations, what are the implications for the future of the U.S. economy of recent trends in the formation of new businesses?

Short Answer

Expert verified
New firms might be more likely to introduce disruptive innovations because they are less bound by existing structures and practices and have a greater motivation to innovate to survive and grow. If new businesses are the primary source of productivity enhancing innovations, trends in new business formation will have significant implications for the future of the U.S. economy. An increase could drive economic growth through more disruptive innovations, while a decrease could potentially hinder growth.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding disruptive innovations and the role of new firms

Disruptive innovations are ones that fundamentally change a market, either by creating new ones or revolutionizing existing ones. New firms are often more likely to introduce disruptive innovations because they are less bound by existing structures and practices, which might restrict innovation in established companies. They often start with fresh perspectives and are motivated to make a strong market impact in order to survive and grow, which could drive disruptive innovation.
02

Discussing implications of the role of new firms in the U.S. economy

Assuming that disruptive innovation is driven primarily by new firms, trends in the formation of new businesses in the U.S. is likely to directly impact the future of its economy. If the number of new businesses is increasing, this could imply more potential for disruptive innovations which could enhance productivity and drive economic growth. On the other hand, a decrease in new business formation could potentially hinder economic progress.
03

Incorporating recent trends into the analysis

Incorporating recent trends in new business formation will require some research. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, in 2019 the number of startup firms was on the rise after having declined following the Great Recession. Given this trend, this could indicate potential for further disruptive innovation in the U.S. economy. However, the impact of other factors would also need to be considered.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

New Firm Dynamics
In exploring the dynamics of new firms, it becomes clear that fresh entrants to the market have notably been the crucibles for disruptive innovation. Unlike established corporations, new firms benefit from a certain nimbleness, with fewer bureaucratic hurdles and legacy systems that tend to stifle innovation.

They thrive on agile methodologies and are often built around a single, innovative idea that challenges the status quo. Moreover, new firms operate under different financial pressures that may incentivize risk-taking in pursuit of rapid growth. They are less likely to be committed to existing technologies or customer bases, which frees them to explore uncharted territories in product or service offerings.

Thus, the dynamism of these rookie participants in the market is an essential component in the broader spectrum of economic development and industrial innovation. Their unique position allows them to foster what is often referred to as 'creative destruction', introducing new technologies or business models that can ultimately redefine entire industries.
Productivity Enhancing Innovations
Stemming from the energetic contributions of new firms, productivity enhancing innovations are pivotal in generating economic growth. These innovations represent improvements in the methods by which products are manufactured or services are delivered, resulting in increased efficiency and output.

By implementing novel technologies or optimizing operational processes, firms can achieve more with less, which is the essence of enhanced productivity. The rippling effect of such productivity gains is evident in improved competitive advantage, which can lead to a higher standard of living within the economy as the benefits are distributed through the reduced cost of goods and services, higher wages, and potentially, new job creation.

Digging deeper, these types of innovations encompass not just technological advancements, but also organizational and process improvements, such as lean manufacturing, just-in-time inventory systems, and advancements in logistics and supply chain management. The integration of digital tools and smart systems into traditional industries exemplifies how productivity is continuously being redefined and advanced.
U.S. Economy Entrepreneurship Trends
The U.S. economy has long thrived on the entrepreneurial spirit, with trends in entrepreneurship serving as a proxy for economic vitality. Entering the new millennium, there was a marked decline in entrepreneurship as economic barriers increased and the market became more concentrated. However, recent trends signal a rejuvenation of startup culture, particularly in the technology sector.

The rise of the 'gig' economy and the proliferation of platforms that support independent work have contributed to new business formations. This shift to a more entrepreneurial mindset among the workforce has been bolstered by advancements in technology, which have lowered the barriers to entry for starting new businesses.

With the increase in startup accelerators, crowdfunding platforms, and venture capital interest, there's a vibrant support system for budding entrepreneurs. As these new businesses become incubators for innovation, the role they play in introducing job opportunities and energizing the economy cannot be overstated. The entrepreneurial trends within the U.S. are therefore not merely reflective of business activities but are indicative of the country's potential for sustained economic dynamism and its adaptation to the global marketplace.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Evaluate the following argument: I would like to invest in the stock market, but I think that buying shares of stock in a corporation is too risky. Suppose I buy \(\$ 10,000\) of Twitter stock, and the company ends up going bankrupt. Because as a stockholder I'm part owner of the company, I might be responsible for paying hundreds of thousands of dollars of the company's debts.

(Related to the Apply the Concept on page 264) A column in the Wall Street Journal listed "trying to forecast what stocks will do next" as one of the three mistakes investors make repeatedly. Briefly explain why trying to forecast stock prices would be a mistake for the average investor.

What is the difference between direct finance and indirect finance? If you borrow money from a bank to buy a new car, are you using direct finance or indirect finance?

What does it mean to describe large corporations as having a separation of ownership from control? How is the separation of ownership from control related to the principal-agent problem?

Dane decides to give up a job earning \(\$ 200,000\) per year as a corporate lawyer and converts the duplex that he owns into a UFO museum. (He had been renting out the duplex for \(\$ 20,000\) a year.) His explicit costs are \(\$ 75,000\) per year paid to his assistants and \(\$ 10,000\) per year for utilities. Fans flock to the museum to see his collection of extraterrestrial paraphernalia, which he could easily sell on eBay for \(\$ 1,000,000\). Over the course of the year, the museum brings in revenues of \(\$ 200,000\). a. How much is Dane's accounting profit for the year? b. Is Dane earning an economic profit? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free