Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

As readers of Herman Melville's 1851 novel Moby Dick know, at one time oil made from whale blubber was an important source of energy that was widely used by households and firms in oil lamps. Other sources of energy replaced whale oil in the second half of the nineteenth century, and today many Americans consider whales only as a source of entertainment on visits to aquariums and whale watching excursions. But some species of whales-including baleen and gray whales-are in danger of extinction. The U.S. Department of Agriculture estimates that more than 9 billion chickens are raised for food annually. Chickens, unlike whales, are not threatened with extinction. Briefly explain why.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The potential extinction of whales is due to their slow reproduction rate and overhunting caused by high demand for whale oil in the past. In contrast, chickens are not threatened by extinction because of their fast reproduction rate despite the high demand for chicken meat.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the economic value and demand for whales and chickens

Initially, there was a high demand for whale oil, which was used in oil lamps. Over time, other sources of energy replaced whale oil. On the other hand, the demand for chickens has remained high as they are raised for food. This difference in demand for goods (oil from whales and meat from chickens) derived from these animals impacts their populations. The decreasing demand for whale oil eventually led to a decrease in whale hunting.
02

Consider reproduction rate of whales and chickens

Whales, baleen and gray whales specifically, have a low reproduction rate compared to chickens. Whales produce offspring very infrequently and in small numbers, while chickens can produce multiple offspring quickly and frequently. Due to this, the population of chickens can replenish more quickly compared to the slow reproduction rate of whales.
03

Reflect on extinction status due to consumption

Due to the high demand and the slow reproduction rate, whales were overhunted, pushing them closer to extinction. In contrast, chickens are not threatened with extinction despite being consumed in large quantities because they reproduce at a much faster rate.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Reproduction Rates and Extinction
Understanding the correlation between reproduction rates and extinction is pivotal when discussing species survival. Whales, including the baleen and gray species, face a severe risk of extinction which can, in part, be attributed to their low reproduction rates. Whales reach sexual maturity late and have long gestation periods, typically birthing a single calf after a year or more. This slow reproductive turnaround fails to compensate for losses due to hunting or environmental changes.

In contrast, chickens illustrate a starkly different reproductive pattern. They have comparatively short gestation periods and can lay eggs frequently throughout the year, which may hatch into multiple offspring. This rapid and plentiful reproduction cycle allows for the chicken population to sustain itself, even when facing large-scale commercial farming and consumption. Thus, even with high levels of utilization, chickens are far from facing the threat of extinction solely because their reproductive rates ensure population sustainability.
Demand for Animal Products
The concept of demand for animal products heavily impacts the existence of various species. Historical data reveals that whale oil was once a prized commodity for its use in lighting. However, once replaced by other energy sources, the demand plummeted, resulting in a reduced incidence of whaling. Today, although most societies view whales more for their aesthetic and environmental value rather than a consumable product, certain regions continue to hunt whales, albeit at a less sustainable rate given their reproductive constraints.On another note, chickens are in high demand for their meat and eggs, seen as staples in many diets globally. This constant demand fuels a robust and ongoing cycle of breeding and farming, designed to meet consumer needs without jeopardizing the species. This example reflects how high demand, when paired with a species' ability to reproduce swiftly, can secure its status away from the brink of extinction.
Population Sustainability
When considering population sustainability, one must evaluate a species' ability to maintain its numbers over time. Factors contributing to this include reproductive rates, mortality rates, and human consumption patterns. As previously mentioned, chickens can sustain their population despite substantial commercial farming. This is mainly because their short life cycle and quick maturation allow for frequent reproduction, ensuring a steady supply.

Environmental and Human Factors

Environmental conditions and human practices can significantly impact a species' sustainability. For whales, anthropogenic threats include hunting and habitat destruction, while for chickens, human practices have developed around sustaining and expanding their populations for consumption. Effective conservation strategies are crucial for at-risk species, implying restrictions on hunting and addressing habitat concerns to foster an environment where species can naturally continue their life cycles and prevent possible extinction.
Conservation Economics
The field of conservation economics balances ecological needs with economic interests, aiming to protect biological diversity while considering the financial implications. It involves assessing the economic benefits of conservation versus the costs of losing a species. Whales, for instance, contribute to marine biodiversity and bring economic benefits through activities like eco-tourism. Hence, their conservation is vital, albeit challenging due to their low economic utility in modern times compared to the past.

Costs and Incentives

Conservation efforts often require substantial funding. Protecting habitats, enforcing anti-poaching laws, and conducting scientific research all involve costs. Creating economic incentives for conservation, such as through eco-tourism or sustainable harvesting practices, can encourage both conservation and economic viability. Chickens, however, while not at risk of extinction, pose different economic considerations—factoring in the ethics of mass production and the environmental impact of poultry farming. Balancing these concerns with global dietary demands remains a constant challenge within conservation economics.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A neighbor's barking dog can be both a positive externality and a negative externality. Under what circumstances would a dog's bark be a positive externality? Under what circumstances would a dog's bark be a negative externality?

(Related to the Apply the Concept on page 163) An economist for the Brookings Institution argued that "a price on carbon would minimize the cost of steering economic activity away from the greenhouse gas emissions that threaten the climate." a. In what sense does a carbon tax put a price on carbon? b. How would a carbon tax steer economic activity away from greenhouse gas emissions? c. Why might a carbon tax be less costly to the economy than a command-and- control approach to reducinggreenhouse gases? Why might a command-and-control approach to pollution control still be more politically popular than a carbon tax? Include in your answer a brief discussion of the difference between the normative analysis and positive analysis of this policy issue.

Vaccines don't provide immunity from disease for some people. But if most people get vaccinated against a disease, such as measles, then the population achieves "herd immunity," which means that there are so few cases of the disease that even people for whom vaccinations are ineffective are unlikely to contract the disease. An article in the Economist argued that "herd immunity is a classic public good." a. Do you agree with this statement? b. The same article argued that there is an incentive to "free ride' off the contributions of others" by not getting vaccinated. What does the author mean by "free ride"? If the author is correct, what will be the effect of this free riding? c. Given your answer to part (b), why do most people vaccinate their children against childhood diseases, and why do many adults get vaccinated against influenza?

What are transactions costs? When are we likely to see private solutions to the problem of externalities?

An article in the Economist noted that Uber, the ride-hailing app, "is said to worsen traffic problems" and observed that the result is a negative externality. a. Explain the reasoning behind the argument that using Uber might generate a negative externality. b. If Uber generates a negative externality, should the government impose a tax on each ride? Should the government also tax rides in taxis? Should it tax rides in private cars? Briefly explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free