Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

What is the tragedy of the commons? How can it be avoided?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The tragedy of the commons refers to a situation where individuals, acting independently according to their self-interest, deplete a shared resource, causing a net negative for all. It can be avoided through privatization, regulation, community management, and education about the consequences of overexploitation.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding The Tragedy of The Commons

The 'Tragedy of the Commons' is a theory attributed to Garrett Hardin, and it illustrates a dilemma where individuals acting independently and rationally according to their self-interest behave contrary to the best interests of the whole by depleting some common resource. The classic example used to demonstrate this concept is a shared pasture (the 'commons') used by herders. Each herder will try to maximize their gain by adding more livestock to the pasture. In the short term, each herder benefits from this practice. However, when every herder adds more livestock, the pasture swiftly becomes overgrazed and can no longer sustain the animals, resulting in a net negative for all.
02

Identifying Solutions for The Tragedy of The Commons

1. Privatization is one solution as it splits the resource into parcels, providing each user with a motive to preserve their property. 2. Regulation can be another solution where rules or laws are put in place to limit the use of commons. 3. Another approach is through community management, where local communities regulate the use of commons thereby ensuring their sustainable use. 4. Educating people about the potential consequences of overexploitation can also be an effective tool.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Garrett Hardin
Garrett Hardin was an influential ecologist and philosopher, most renowned for his exploration of environmental issues and population dynamics. He introduced the term "Tragedy of the Commons" in his 1968 paper, which focused on the conflicts between individual interests and the collective welfare of a community. Hardin's metaphor explains the consequences when individuals overuse a shared resource, leading to resource depletion. For example, in a shared piece of land where every herder adds more livestock to maximize personal gain, the land becomes overgrazed. Hardin emphasized that unrestricted population growth leads to overuse and destruction of essential resources.

His work urged people to rethink how common resources are managed, drawing attention to the need for better cooperative strategies. Hardin believed in curbing certain freedoms for the greater good, suggesting that without some form of intervention or management, the "commons" would invariably collapse.
Resource Depletion
Resource depletion refers to the exhaustion of natural resources due to overconsumption or overuse. In the context of the "Tragedy of the Commons," this occurs when individuals, acting out of self-interest, excessively utilize a shared resource until it is no longer sustainable. Examples of resource depletion include deforestation, overfishing, and soil degradation.

The depletion of these resources can have profound and lasting effects on the environment and future generations. When a resource is depleted, it can lead to:
  • Loss of biodiversity
  • Increased scarcity of raw materials
  • Economic instabilities
  • Displacement of populations
Mitigating resource depletion involves understanding the limits of natural reserves and managing human consumption to allow for replenishment. Sustainable practices and better resource management strategies need to be embraced to ensure that resources can meet current and future needs.
Community Management
Community management as a strategy offers a collaborative approach to managing shared resources. Unlike privatization or strict regulations imposed by external authorities, community management empowers local groups to create and enforce their own rules for sustainable resource use. This approach relies on social norms and collective decision-making processes.

Benefits of community management include:
  • Localized control and direct accountability
  • Enhanced cooperation and communication among members
  • Increased compliance due to a sense of ownership
  • Adaptation of rules to suit specific local conditions
It works best in settings where individuals are personally invested in the health of the resource and where strong social bonds and commitments exist. Successful examples include community-managed forests and fisheries, where locals come together to monitor use and enforce sustainable practices.
Privatization
Privatization involves transferring the ownership of a common resource from the community to private entities or individuals. By granting exclusive rights to a resource, the owner has an incentive to manage it responsibly. The theory here is that private owners will act to preserve their resource to avoid depletion and ensure long-term benefits.

Pros of privatization include:
  • Increased investment in resource maintenance
  • Clear responsibility and reduced dispute over resource use
  • Potential for efficient resource management
However, privatization can also lead to downsides:
  • Exclusion of community members from resource access
  • Potential over-exploitation driven by profit motivations
  • Loss of communal heritage and culture linked to the shared resource
Successful privatization requires careful consideration of the social and economic consequences and ensuring that the benefits are shared equitably.
Regulation
Regulation can offer an effective mechanism to prevent the "Tragedy of the Commons." By imposing rules or restrictions on how resources are used, they are protected from overuse and possible destruction. Regulations can take various forms, such as permits, quotas, or seasonal restrictions, depending on the resource type.

Effective regulations entail:
  • Scientific assessments to set sustainable usage limits
  • Transparent and participatory rule-making processes
  • Ongoing monitoring and enforcement
  • Penalties for non-compliance
While regulation can significantly reduce the risk of resource depletion, it requires proper implementation and enforcement. Balancing regulatory needs against economic growth and supporting public awareness and education are crucial elements for successful regulation.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In the first years following the passage of the Clean Air Act in \(1970,\) air pollution declined sharply, and there were important health benefits, including a decline in infant mortality. According to an article in the Economist, however, recently some policymakers "worry that the EPA is constantly tightening restrictions on pollution, at ever higher cost to business but with diminishing returns in terms of public health." a. Why might additional reductions in air pollution come at "ever higher cost"? What does the article mean by arguing that these reductions will result in "diminishing returns in terms of public health"? b. How should the federal government decide whether further reductions in air pollution are needed?

Define rivalry and excludability and use these terms to discuss the four categories of goods.

William Easterly in The White Man's Burden shared the following account by New York University Professor Leonard Wantchekon of how Professor Wantchekon's village in Benin, Africa, managed the local fishing pond when he was growing up: To open the fishing season, elders performed ritual tests at Amlé, a lake fifteen kilometers from the village. If the fish were large enough, fishing was allowed for two or three days. If they were too small, all fishing was forbidden, and anyone who secretly fished the lake at this time was outcast, excluded from the formal and informal groups that formed the village's social structure. Those who committed this breach of trust were often shunned by the whole community; no one would speak to the offender, or even acknowledge his existence for a year or more. What economic problem were the village elders trying to prevent? Do you think their solution was effective?

In discussing the reduction of air pollution in the developing world, Richard Fuller of the Blacksmith Institute, an environmental organization, observed, "It's the \(90 / 10\) rule. To do 90 percent of the work only costs 10 percent of the money. It's the last 10 percent of the cleanup that costs 90 percent of the money." Why should it be any more costly to clean up the last 10 percent of polluted air than to clean up the first 90 percent? What trade-offs would be involved in cleaning up the final 10 percent? Source: Tiffany M. Luck, "The World's Dirtiest Cities," Forbes, February 26,2008 .

A columnist for the Wall Street Journal argued that highspeed Internet connections are now a public good: "We're going to have to transition to the building of public infrastructure and away from the revolution being the domain of private enterprise. It's not enough for Google to roll out high- speed fiber to a handful of cities." a. In what ways is the infrastructure for high-speed Internet connections like automobile highways? In what ways is it different from highways? b. As of 2017 , private firms have constructed most of the infrastructure for high-speed Internet connections, while governments have constructed most highways. Is it still possible that the infrastructure for high-speed Internet connections is a public good despite this fact? Briefly explain. c. Do you agree with the columnist that we should think of the infrastructure for high-speed Internet connections as being like a public good? Is there any information you would need to know before deciding?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free