In the first years following the passage of the Clean Air Act in \(1970,\) air
pollution declined sharply, and there were important health benefits,
including a decline in infant mortality. According to an article in the
Economist, however, recently some policymakers "worry that the EPA is
constantly tightening restrictions on pollution, at ever higher cost to
business but with diminishing returns in terms of public health."
a. Why might additional reductions in air pollution come at "ever higher
cost"? What does the article mean by arguing that these reductions will result
in "diminishing returns in terms of public health"?
b. How should the federal government decide whether further reductions in air
pollution are needed?