Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

What does it mean for a producer or consumer to internalize an externality? What would cause a producer or consumer to internalize an externalitv????

Short Answer

Expert verified
To internalize an externality means that a producer or a consumer takes into consideration the wider costs or impacts of their production or consumption activities. They may do this due to legal requirements, social pressure, or due to their own moral or ethical beliefs.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Concept of Externalities

Externalities are termed as the costs or benefits that affect a party who did not choose to incur those costs or benefits. Basically, they are the side effects of industrial processes that are not reflected in the cost of the products or services offered by the producer.
02

What does it mean to internalize an externality?

When we talk about a producer or a consumer internalizing an externality, it means that they take into account the wider impact of their production or consumption activities. Such as the cost to society due to pollution created in the process of production, it is added into the cost of the product or service. This means that they are acknowledging that their actions have wider impacts and are taking responsibility for them.
03

Reasons why producers or consumers would internalize an externality

There are various reasons why a producer or a consumer may choose to internalize an externality. Legal requirements: Government regulations might enforce producers to internalize the cost of pollution created by their production process. Social pressure: Consumers might choose to pay more for a product that is produced in a sustainable way due to societal expectations. Moral or ethical beliefs: A producer might choose to internalize an externality out of their own moral or ethical beliefs. They would do this by taking full responsibility for the costs their activities enforce on others.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Externalities
Externalities are essentially the unintended side effects of economic activities that affect third parties who did not choose to be affected. They can be either positive or negative. For instance, pollution from a factory can harm the health of nearby residents, representing a negative externality.
While planting trees might offer shade and cleaner air, benefiting the community, which can be considered a positive externality. Producers and consumers often overlook these externalities in their decision-making as they focus primarily on their personal costs and benefits.
  • Positive Externalities: Benefits received by others without compensation.
  • Negative Externalities: Costs inflicted on others without facing consequences.
Social Responsibility
Social responsibility is the duty or obligation for businesses and individuals to act in a way that benefits society at large. It involves recognizing and addressing the impact of one's actions on the external environment.
By internalizing externalities, a business can improve its social standing and demonstrate its commitment to ethical practices. Companies often do this by responding to societal demands for more sustainable and fair production practices.
  • Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): A self-regulating business model that helps a company be socially accountable.
  • Community Impact: Emphasizing activities that can improve community well-being.
Government Regulation
Government regulation plays a critical role in internalizing externalities. When left unchecked, producers may ignore the broader social costs of their actions. Regulatory policies can mandate that these costs are included in the pricing of products and services.
For example, a carbon tax on emissions is an approach where the government charges companies for the greenhouse gases they emit. This not only helps lower emissions but also encourages eco-friendly practices and innovation.
  • Environmental Regulations: Laws and rules designed to protect the air, water, and land from pollution.
  • Taxes and Penalties: Financial charges imposed to discourage negative externalities.
Ethical Consumption
Ethical consumption involves making purchasing decisions that align with one's moral beliefs, specifically concerning the environmental and social impacts of products. Consumers who practice ethical consumption choose to support companies that internalize their externalities by opting for sustainable and socially responsible products.
This change in consumer behavior encourages businesses to adopt greener practices and better ensure fair labor conditions.
  • Environmentally Friendly Products: Goods produced with minimal harm to the planet.
  • Fair Trade: Products certified to meet certain social, environmental, and economic standards.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In the first years following the passage of the Clean Air Act in \(1970,\) air pollution declined sharply, and there were important health benefits, including a decline in infant mortality. According to an article in the Economist, however, recently some policymakers "worry that the EPA is constantly tightening restrictions on pollution, at ever higher cost to business but with diminishing returns in terms of public health." a. Why might additional reductions in air pollution come at "ever higher cost"? What does the article mean by arguing that these reductions will result in "diminishing returns in terms of public health"? b. How should the federal government decide whether further reductions in air pollution are needed?

An article in the Economist about the struggle among airline passengers over reclining seats offered the following observation: "Given that airlines are unlikely to increase the [distance between] their seats any time soon, better that all planes come with fixed, non-reclining chairs in the first place." Would the change proposed result in an economically efficient outcome? Briefly explain. Source: "Upright and Uptight," Economist, June 7, 2014 .

If the marginal cost of reducing a certain type of pollution is zero, should all of that type of pollution be eliminated? Briefly explain.

In recent years, companies have used fracking, or hydraulic fracturing, in drilling for oil and natural gas that previously could not be profitably recovered. According to an article in the New York Times, "horizontal drilling has enabled engineers to inject millions of gallons of high-pressure water directly into layers of shale to create the fractures that release the gas. Chemicals added to the water dissolve minerals, kill bacteria that might plug up the well, and insert sand to prop open the fractures." Experts are divided about whether fracking results in significant pollution, but some people worry that chemicals used in fracking might lead to pollution of underground supplies of water used by households and farms. a. First, assume that fracking causes no significant pollution. Use a demand and supply graph to show the effect of fracking on the market for natural gas. b. Now assume that fracking does result in pollution. On your graph from part (a), show the effect of fracking. Be sure to carefully label all curves and all equilibrium points. c. In your graph in part (b), what has happened to the efficient level of output and the efficient price in the market for natural gas compared with the situation before fracking? Can you be certain that the efficient level of output and the efficient price have risen or fallen as a result of fracking? Briefly explain.

(Related to Solved Problem 5.3 on page 160 ) Solved Problem 5.3 contains the statement "Of course, the government actually collects the tax from sellers rather than from consumers, but we get the same result whether the government imposes a tax on the buyers of a good or on the sellers." Demonstrate that this statement is correct by solving the problem, assuming that the increase in the tax on gasoline shifts the supply curve rather than the demand curve.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free