Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The merry-go-round in Ross Park, a public park in Binghamton, New York, was first installed in 1920 and has been periodically refurbished by the city in the years since. There is no entry fee to visit the park or to ride the merry- go-round. Is the merry-go-round a public good? Briefly explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Yes, the merry-go-round is a public good as it is non-excludable and non-rivalrous.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Characteristics of Public Goods

A public good has two main features. Firstly, it is non-excludable – meaning individuals cannot be effectively excluded from use. Secondly, it is non-rivalrous meaning that its use by one individual does not reduce availability to others.
02

Apply the Criteria to the Merry-Go-Round

The merry-go-round is located in a public park with no entry fee, and there is no charge to ride the merry-go-round. This makes it non-excludable as people are not barred from utilizing it due to cost. It's also non-rivalrous; one individual riding the merry-go-round does not prevent others from doing so. Therefore, the merry-go-round meets both criteria.
03

Formulate Your Conclusion

Based on the criteria defining a public good, it can be concluded that the merry-go-round is indeed a public good as it is both non-excludable and non-rivalrous.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Non-Excludable Goods
When we talk about non-excludable goods, we're referring to products or services that cannot easily prevent people from using them. Once provided, no one can be effectively barred from enjoying their benefits, regardless of whether they have paid for them. Public parks are classic examples of non-excludable goods. Imagine yourself walking into Ross Park in Binghamton—there's no gatekeeper charging admission, allowing everyone free entry. Similarly, the merry-go-round in this park is accessible to all, mirroring the essence of non-excludability. It's like a radio broadcast; as long as you have a receiver, you're in on the tunes being aired, whether or not you contribute to the station.
Non-Rivalrous Goods
When we delve into the topic of non-rivalrous goods, we find another characteristic of public goods. These are goods that one person's consumption does not diminish another's ability to consume. Think about a lighthouse: its guiding light helps all ships equally, without being less useful to one ship if another also navigates by its shine. In the case of the merry-go-round at Ross Park, one child's joyous ride doesn't make it less available for the next eager child waiting their turn (provided there's space). This is in contrast to a slice of cake—once eaten by someone, it unfortunately can't be enjoyed by another.
Economic Principles
The world runs on a complex system of economic principles, rules that govern the production, distribution, and consumption of goods and services. Thinking about the merry-go-round again, its very existence is thanks to the application of such principles by the local government. Economists are particularly concerned with how resources are allocated and used in society. For instance, if a certain resource is limited, how should it be distributed fairly and efficiently? Public goods like the merry-go-round come into the picture here, too, as they're typically provided without a direct profit motive but address a broader public interest or need—joy and recreation for the community in this case.
Market Failure
Sometimes, marketplaces don't work perfectly and fail to allocate resources in a way that benefits society as a whole, and this is what we mean by market failure. For instance, private companies might not provide a park or a merry-go-round since they can't easily charge everyone who uses them, and thus can't guarantee profits. It's here that government often steps in, recognizing that certain goods—like this historic merry-go-round in Ross Park—serve a public benefit that's worth funding for the collective good. This intervention is essential because without it, the market alone might not provide these non-excludable and non-rivalrous goods, depriving the community of valuable resources and experiences.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Briefly explain whether you agree with the following statement: "If there is a shortage of a good, it must be scarce, but there is not a shortage of every scarce good."

A columnist for the Wall Street Journal argued that highspeed Internet connections are now a public good: "We're going to have to transition to the building of public infrastructure and away from the revolution being the domain of private enterprise. It's not enough for Google to roll out high- speed fiber to a handful of cities." a. In what ways is the infrastructure for high-speed Internet connections like automobile highways? In what ways is it different from highways? b. As of 2017 , private firms have constructed most of the infrastructure for high-speed Internet connections,while governments have constructed most highways. Is it still possible that the infrastructure for high-speed Internet connections is a public good despite this fact? Briefly explain. c. Do you agree with the columnist that we should think of the infrastructure for high-speed Internet connections as being like a public good? Is there any information you would need to know before deciding?

The competitive equilibrium rent in the city of Lowell is currently \(\$ 1,000\) per month. The government decides to enact rent control and establish a price ceiling of \(\$ 750\) per month for apartments. Briefly explain whether rent control is likely to make each of the following people better or worse off. a. Someone currently renting an apartment in Lowell b. Someone who will be moving to Lowell next year and who intends to rent an apartment c. A landlord who intends to abide by the rent control law d. A landlord who intends to ignore the law and illegally charge the highest rent possible for his apartments

In recent years, companies have used fracking, or hydraulic fracturing, in drilling for oil and natural gas that previously could not be profitably recovered. According to an article in the New York Times, "horizontal drilling has enabled engineers to inject millions of gallons of high-pressure water directly into layers of shale to create the fractures that release the gas. Chemicals added to the water dissolve minerals, kill bacteria that might plug up the well, and insert sand to prop open the fractures." Experts are divided about whether fracking results in significant pollution, but some people worry that chemicals used in fracking might lead to pollution of underground supplies of water used by households and farms. a. First, assume that fracking causes no significant pollution. Use a demand and supply graph to show the effect of fracking on the market for natural gas. b. Now assume that fracking does result in pollution. On your graph from part (a), show the effect of fracking. Be sure to carefully label all curves and all equilibrium points. c. In your graph in part (b), what has happened to the efficient level of output and the efficient price in the market for natural gas compared with the situation before fracking? Can you be certain that the efficient level of output and the efficient price have risen or fallen as a result of fracking? Briefly explain.

Use the information on the kumquat market in the table to answer the following questions. $$ \begin{array}{c|c|c} \begin{array}{c} \text { Price } \\ \text { (per crate) } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { Quantity Demanded } \\ \text { (millions of crates } \\ \text { per year) } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { Quantity Supplied } \\ \text { (millions of crates } \\ \text { per year) } \end{array} \\ \hline \$ 10 & 120 & 20 \\ \hline 15 & 110 & 60 \\ \hline 20 & 100 & 100 \\ \hline 25 & 90 & 140 \\ \hline 30 & 80 & 180 \\ \hline 35 & 70 & 220 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. What are the equilibrium price and quantity? How much revenue do kumquat producers receive when the market is in equilibrium? Draw a graph showing the market equilibrium and the area representing the revenue kumquat producers receive. b. Suppose the federal government decides to impose a price floor of \(\$ 30\) per crate. Now how many crates of kumquats will consumers purchase? How much revenue will kumquat producers receive? Assume that the government does not purchase any surplus kumquats. On your graph from part (a), show the price floor, the change in the quantity of kumquats purchased, and the revenue kumquat producers receive after the price floor is imposed. c. Suppose the government imposes a price floor of \(\$ 30\) per crate and purchases any surplus kumquats from producers. Now how much revenue will kumquat producers receive? How much will the government spend on purchasing surplus kumquats? On your graph from part (a), show the area representing the amount the government spends to purchase the surplus kumquats.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free